Monday, February 27, 2006


The movie "Syriana" starring George Clooney and based on CIA Rob Baer opens this weekend. The executive producer is Steven Soderbergh, and the screenplay is by Stephen Gaghan.

Soderbergh directed "Traffic" which won Oscars for Best Film and Best Director in 2001. Stephen Gaghan wrote the screenplay for "Traffic" and won an oscar for that too.

"Syriana" brings together this Oscar-winning team.

What else happened in 2001? On September 11th? 9/11?

In "Traffic" towards the end of the film there is a scene in which a dead Mexican general and a plane full of drugs has been found. In the foreground of this scene there are a number of boxes each with "9/11" stamped on them and in full view throughout the scene. What is the point in that? Were they sending a message to us?

Was this just coincidence?

George Clooney also starred in a "Three Kings" which was about a war in Iraq and lots of looting and stealing going on. "Three Kings" was released before the war on Iraq, indeed before 9/11.

There are other 9/11 coincidences.

Another film released in 2001 was "Pearl Harbour". This contained lots of 9's and 11's. By this I mean there were numbers such 234 which when added as 2+3+4 = 9. The particular scene I find interesting is the scene in which Pearl Harbour has been attacked and our two heroes Ben Affleck and Josh Hartnett find some planes and take-off in them to shoot down the Japanese. The numbers on their planes are 306 and 308.
3+0+6 = 9.
3+0+8 = 11.

The Project for a New American Century published a document called "Rebuilding America's Defences" which went on about the need for America to significantly increase the strength and technological capability of the US military, and to also mould the world into one that suits America i.e. pretty much what America is trying to do now. However, in that document PNAC said that such action would take a long time unless there was "another Pearl Harbour". Well, lucky them! They got that on 9/11.

Another 9/11 coincidence occurs in "Enemy of the State" starring John Voight. Voight plays a renegade spook using NSA facilities for his evil purposes. His birthdate is on 11th September 1940, or 9/11/40. We see this when the NSA computer is hacked and Voight's characters details are listed on the VDU. It is thought that what is actually occuring and happened on 9/11 is that organisations such as the NSA were and are being used by an evil cabal for their private gains, so this is actually quite disturbing that a film released in 1998 would be using a character whose birthday is on 9/11 shows what happened on 9/11.

But back to "Syriana". Clooney starred in a film about looting Iraq which was released four years before the invasion of Iraq. Gaghan and Soderbergh received Oscars for a film they created in 2001 which had boxes with 9/11 in the foreground of a particular scene.

Plus it now looks like Iran and Russia may be coming to some sort of agreement over the processing of uranium.

The document "A Clean Break" listed Syria and Lebanon as targets for destabilisation and regime change. A week or so ago I noticed a few posts and articles starting to appear about Iraq's alleged WMD being secreted out of Iraq to Syria and Lebanon under the watchful eyes of the US spy satellites in 2002/early 2003.

So who knows...

Is it Syria?

Or is it Iran?

"Irana" doesn't have the same ring to it, does it?

Wednesday, February 22, 2006


The Bank for International Settlements based in Basel, Switzerland, has called for the worlds currencies to be replaced by a smaller basket of currencies covering specific currency blocks.

From The Daily Telegraph at

...But the powerful Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has now voiced grave doubts about the policy and called on politicians to begin debating an overhaul of the current global economic system.

In another radical move it has also suggested ditching many national currencies in favour of a small number of formal currency blocks based on the dollar, euro and renminbi or yen.

The whole point of this is that it will be easier for them to control the global economy. It will also be easier to ditch this smaller basket of currencies later for just the one currency to give a global currency. This will be electronic, and therefore traceable. I think this implies that certain activities which are currently outlawed will be made legal, and thus taxable e.g. drugs. This currency will be electronic because then there will be no bank runs and the banks don't have to keep hard currency anywhere, and you will therefore be virtually totally dependent on the banks.


So, the al-Askari shrine in Samarra has been blown up.

According to The Independent
National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie said armed men wearing special forces uniforms broke inside the shrine and seized the guards, including policemen, responsible for protecting the site. The gunmen planted the explosives and fled.

In the last few weeks we have seen cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed published across Europe, resulting in riots and arson.

Then a video of British troops beating Iraqis senseless is published by The News of the World.

Then more photographs of abuse of Iraqis by US troops at Abu Ghraib are published.

The government in Basra withdraws its cooperation with the British Army.

I would have guessed that Iraq was ready to blow.

So, with excellent timing, somebody dressed as Iraqi Special Forces broke their way into the al-Askari shrine and blew it up.

I have warned that Iraq would be divided along religious lines. A civil war is required for the US/UK to maintain a presence in Iraq.

Well, you don't think the US/UK would spend billions and billions and billions of dollars to build a stronghold of freedom and democracy and walk away, while at home our freedom and democracy are being taken away?

Or am I being cycnical?

Sunday, February 19, 2006


The editor of Jyllands-Posten, Flemming Rose, who decided to publish the 12 cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed has been given the opportunity to give his point of view in The Washington Post.

For Rose's article go to

Rose talks at length of the right to free speech.

However, Rose does not address the allegation made against him that he has Zionist connections through Daniel Pipes.

Rose indirectly blames the imams who saw the publication of the cartoons as an attack on Islam and went on a tour of the Middle East, adding their own cartoons into the mix. Yes, they are equally as guilty as Rose.

But, Flemming, who gave them the ammunition?

Rose states;
I agree that the freedom to publish things doesn't mean you publish everything. Jyllands-Posten would not publish pornographic images or graphic details of dead bodies; swear words rarely make it into our pages. So we are not fundamentalists in our support for freedom of expression.

So the question remains, why did he decide to break this "taboo" and not the pornographic taboo, or the dead bodies taboo?

I understand, as published here a week or so ago, that the publication of the cartoons was just one of a series of provocations to the Islamic community in Denmark. The World Socialist Website reported;
Shortly before the publication of the Muhammad cartoons, Jyllands-Posten ran a headline reading, “Islam is the Most Belligerent.” The newspaper ran an exposé about an alleged Muslim death-list of Jewish names—until it emerged that the whole thing was a fabrication...When the anticipated reaction by the Muslim community failed to arise [after the publication of the cartoons], the newspaper continued its campaign, determined to create a full-scale scandal. After a week had gone by without protest, journalists turned on Danish Islamic religious leaders who were well known for their fundamentalist views and demanded: “Why don’t you protest?” Eventually, the latter reacted and alerted their co-thinkers in the Middle East.

The Washington Post is associated with the Graham family.

Katharine Graham ran the WP from 1993 to 2001, when she died.
Her son Donald Graham now runs the WP.

Katharine was a regular attendee to Bilderberg meetings.
Donald attended in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, and 2005.

And when Donald didn't attend in 2002 Jim Hoagland, the WP's associate editor attended and no doubt reported back to his master what was agreed (for no notes are taken at these meetings).


It is perhaps the best known secret that Israel has the nuke.

For years now the Arab states in the Middle East have been calling for a nuke-free Middle East. Iran is currently under pressure for restarting nuclear research which it voluntarily stopped. Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is not.

The Strategic Studies Institute of the Army War College has recently published a report entitled “Getting Ready for a Nuclear-Ready Iran”, in which the research group authoring the report states that they believe that Arab states in the Middle East have shown interest in non-conventional weapons as a method of countering Israel's nukes.

The authors also believe that if Israel would "de-nuke" then tensions in the Middle East would decrease dramatically. The authors also suggest that the US government put pressure on Israel to "de-nuke".

So who are the authors of this devastating report?

The Strategic Studies Institute of the Army War College is a training ground for the “best and the brightest” among up-and-coming military officers of the USA!

It comes as no surprise that this report has not been mentioned in the US mainstream media.


Israel: Give Up Your Nukes

Army War College Analysts Believe that Iran Would Abandon Nuclear Program if Israel Did

A report recently published by the distinguished U.S. Army War College has publicly targeted Israel’s controversial—but officially nonexistent—arsenal of nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

In the wake of a growing American media cacophony about Iran’s purported aims of building its own nuclear arsenal—“news” that has largely been stimulated by bellicose rhetoric in Israel itself—the Strategic Studies Institute of the Army War College, which is a training ground for the “best and the brightest” among up-and-coming military officers, has taken quite a different approach.

The college’s report—which has never once been publicized in the major media in America—says that neither talk of a military attack on Iran by Israel nor ongoing American diplomatic initiatives are likely to stop Iran from pursuing its goals. Either course could result in disaster, said America’s military strategists.

Instead, the report, titled “Getting Ready for a Nuclear-Ready Iran,” says, quite in contrast, that it is Israel that should take the initiative.

The American military officers say that Israel should close down its Dimona nuclear reactor, turn over nuclear materiel to a third party, and allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to maintain regular inspection of Israel’s nuclear operations. The report urges the United States to put pressure on Israel to make this possible.

America’s military thinkers believe that if Israel were to curtail its nuclear offensive, the United States would be more easily able to convince other nuclear states in the Middle East to do likewise. It is, in fact, a historic truth that it was Israel’s determined push for nuclear weapons—a documented foundation of that nation’s geopolitical defense policy—that led Arab nations, Pakistan and Iran to pursue nuclear weapons in response.

Israel was born in sin. The founders of Israel were terrorists. But the people at the top of Zionism do not care for Jews, otherwise they would have paid Hitler the ransom he wanted for Jews. Instead many Jews were slaves and murdered.

So why would these top Zionists allow their Jewish bretheren to die?

The truth is they are not Jews, but are using Jews in Israel to anger Arab states into terrorism and pursuit of WMD. The support that the USA also gives Israel adds to this. So Israel was GIVEN the nuke, and the states surrounding Israel are angered.

Under what circumstances would Israel use the nuke?

Does Israel, under stress from the suicide bombings etc, have a twitchy nuke-trigger finger?

To get an idea of how Israel is to be used, imagine a new flag of Israel. Instead of the Star of David between two lines imagine a target, such as you would find in archery.

Below is my suggestion for the new flag of Israel.

Thursday, February 16, 2006


Rupert Murdoch's Brisbane-based Courier-Mail on 4th February.

Australia was the 3rd main member of "the coalition of the willing (to start the "clash of civilizations")" which invaded Iraq.

Again, why did Murdoch's Courier-Mail publish the cartoons?

Why did Murdoch's The News of the World publish the video of British soldiers beating Iraqi kids last weekend?

And now the cartoons that the Pentagon tried to ban have been "leaked" to an Australian broadcaster (not Murdoch's as far as I know). I guess Australia wasn't burning up enough.

"someone" is trying to incite the extreme elements of Islam, I think in Iraq, so that Iran can be blamed.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006


MPs have voted to keep the clause in the Terrorism Bill 2005 that outlaws "glorification" of terrorism.

I watched the first half of the debate on BBC Parliament today. Several things about this are scarey;
1. there is no definition of terrorism.
2. there is no definition of glorification.

How can that be good law?

Blair said that retaining the clause is vital to protect the public from the likes of Abu Hamza. But Hamza was charged and found guilty BEFORE this bill has even been passed. Therefore the clause is unnecessary because the laws we have are sufficient.

Could I be charged under this section of the bill due to the content of my webpage on Israel which gives a truer and totally different view of the standard history of Israel we are given.

Could it be argued that pointing out the real, sordid history of Israel is "glorifying" terrorism?

This is the point that the Tories etc were making. The term "glorification" is so vague that interpretation of it can lead to abuse of the law, if passed. Its use could be applied with discretion, with some people left alone while others are charged and found guilty. We saw what happened at the Labour Party Conference when Walter Wolfgang heckled Jack Straw.

This is bad.

I cannot see how so many MPs could vote for this, unless they have been promised something in return, e.g. a new ministerial position such as The Minister for Chewing Gum.


"The Use and Abuse of Terror" by Peter Oborne is quoted in todays The Independent.

The full document is available at

It should make an interesting read.

It looks at the farcical claims made about bogus terror threats and the reasons for those claims.

Oborne is also on Channel4 next week presenting a documentary on this research.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006


A decade or so ago the implantable microchip was rarely heard of and in its infancy.

A week or so ago in a reply to Ian Blair I suggested that the tremendous media coverage of the disappearance of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman was to scare parents into microchipping their children.

A few days ago I posted a report that several employees of a US company were to be compulsory microchipped.

Over the last few years the implantable microchip has been quietly but steadily introduced into society. Recently Bar Soba in Glasgow introduced a scheme of implantable microchips for its customers. This follows a similar PR stunt in Barcelona, Spain. Articles appear in the press, even the BBC, to sell the implantable microchip. It can store medical records, financially-related records, help track you children etc. These sound like useful applications.

But why the push to chip us like cattle?

Because the people who run the planet think we are just that, CATTLE!

Besides this latest report from America of the compulsory implantable microchip I think every time a chip has been implanted into a human it has been on a voluntary basis. The only way that compulsory microchipping will occur is if there is a horrible war that traumatises us and the government is led to believe that it needs to know where we are every second of every day. This desire is already evident due to the tracking of our car journeys. Identity cards were issued in the UK during WW2, and they continued after WW2 until one man Mr Clarence Willcock said they were a nuisance. Without Willcock they may well have continued, and been re-issued with each advance in technology.

The new batch of ID cards will hold a chip (which is why the current batch of credit cards has one, so we get used to the idea of a microchip about our person and for practical use and identification). The establishment of a national identity register is also just another step towards our every move and thought being recorded.

It may sound useful for an implantable microchip to hold some personal data. But I don't want one inside of me. I know the people who are pushing for it and what they have done.

The reasons given for the introduction of the ID card are terrorism and fraud.

Terrorism is being incited and allowed to happen by the Anglo-American intelligence apparatus.

Fraud? The biggest fraud foisted upon mankind is the system of banking we have called fractional reserve banking that allows banks to create paper/electronic money and lend it out. The bankers have abused this system to finance world wars in order to get a world government. I also understand that the amount of fraud due to fake ID, rather than misrepresentation of circumstances, is not that great.

I predict with great confidence that ID cards will not be the panacea they are touted as, and that when things go wrong with the ID card the implantable microchip will be suggested as the best solution.


The following is an extract from a review of a book which looks at the Anglo-American manipulation of the Middle East through the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Middle East is in the state it is in today because of Great Britain. British agent Hempher developed Wahhabism, which the neocon gimps believe is the religious source of Islamic terrorism.

Let's look at that again. The British are responsible for Wahhabism, which America blames for events such as 9/11, so America ploughs into the Middle East.



Britain's Imperial Synarchy

Although the Muslim Brotherhood was formally launched in Egypt in 1928, the roots of the British-sponsored Freemasonic secret society date further back two generations, to the last quarter of the 19th Century. At that time, British intelligence sponsored the career of a Persian-born Shi'ite named Jamal Eddine, later known as Jamal Eddine al-Afghani (1838-97). A British (and French) Freemason and a professed atheist, al-Afghani spent his entire adult life as an agent of British intelligence, fomenting "Islamist" insurrections where they suited British imperial goals. At points in his fascinating career, he served as Minister of War and Prime Minister of Iran, before leading an insurrection against the Shah. He was a founder of the Young Egypt movement, which was part of a worldwide network of British Jacobin fronts that waged war against Britain's imperial rivals during the second half of the 19th Century. In Sudan, following the Mahdi-led nationalist revolt and the murder of Britain's Lord Gordon, al-Afghani organized an "Islamist" counterrevolution in support of a restoration of British colonial control.

In the finest "Venetian" tradition, al-Afghani promoted a doctrine of "economy of truth"—i.e., truth as an instrument of imperial intrigues. He adopted the name "al-Afghani" to conceal his Persian birth and his Shi'ite Muslim roots, to better serve his British handlers in the largely Sunni regions where he operated. He also spoke cynically of "the social utility of religion."

Al-Afghani was backed by one of Britain's leading Orientalists, Edward Granville Browne, and whenever he ran out of cash, he made a bee-line for London, where he was always provided with funding, a publishing house, and other amenities.

Al-Afghani's leading disciple and fellow British agent was Mohammed Abduh (1849-1905). The Egyptian-born Abduh founded the Salafiyya movement, under the patronage of the British proconsul of Egypt, Evelyn Baring (Lord Cromer). In the 1870s, al-Afghani and Abduh founded the Young Egypt movement, which battled against secular Egyptian nationalists. In the mid-1880s, the two men moved to Paris, where they launched a magazine under British and French Freemasonic sponsorship, called Indissoluble Bond. There are some accounts of al-Afghani's and Abduh's three years in Paris that suggest that they were in direct contact with St. Yves d'Alveydre, the founder of the Synarchist movement. From Paris, the duo returned to London.

In 1899, two years after al-Afghani died, Lord Cromer made Abduh the Grand Mufti of Egypt. Abduh in turn, begat Mohammed Rashid Rida (1865-1935), a Syrian who migrated to Egypt to become Abduh's leading disciple. Rida founded the organization that would be the immediate precursor to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Society of Propaganda and Guidance. That Freemasonic organization published a journal, The Lighthouse, which provided "Islamist" backing to the British colonial rule over Egypt, by attacking Egyptian nationalists as "atheists and infidels." In Cairo, under British patronage, Rida launched the Institute of Propaganda and Guidance, which brought in Islamists from every part of the Muslim world to be trained in political agitation. Rida and other disciples of Abduh founded the People's Party, which openly agitated in support of British colonial rule.

One graduate of the Institute for Propaganda and Guidance, who also was a central figure in the People's Party was Hassan al-Banna (1906-49). Al-Banna would found the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. The original Muslim Brotherhood was an unabashed British intelligence front. The mosque in Ismailia, Egypt, which was the first headquarters of the Brotherhood, was built by the (British) Suez Canal Company, nearby a British World War I military base. During World War II, the Muslim Brotherhood functioned as a de facto branch of the British military. In 1942, the Brotherhood created the "Secret Apparatus," an underground paramilitary organization that specialized in assassinations and espionage.

Monday, February 13, 2006


You've got to see this!


During the last two weeks we have seen riots in some Arab states and arson attacks on some European embassies. This was a result of the publication of some cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed.

Yesterday a video of some British soldiers beating Iraqi civilians, one of them apparently beaten into unconciousness, was released. The News of the World claims credit for bringing this video to light. It was shown all over the Arabic world all day yesterday.

The News of the World is part of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, along with The Sun. TNoTW says it was shown the video by a "disgusted whistleblower".


The video of this sick event was taken nearly two years ago. The Sunday Times, another News Corp paper, asked yesterday;
One of the key mysteries is how such a film could exist and be shown to military personnel for two years without the obvious crimes depicted being reported to the authorities.

How could this video be used by those who want war?

For a start Murdoch's papers were at the front of the propaganda for war on Iraq.

But what if this starts more insurgent operations in Iraq, particularly in the South where the British are in control.

Will the attacks in the new insurgency be blamed on Iran?

And will this increase the likelihood of war on Iran?

At the very least this video will not help the relations between Islam and the West. Just when some calm and rationale was required a paper owned by Zionist Murdoch pours more oil onto the fire.

The timing of the release of this video is highly suspicious.

Sunday, February 12, 2006


This world is not good.

It is dominated by evil, and if there is war on Iran then the gimps and the chumps in and around the White House and White Hall will bring about something even more evil and wrong. NB the use of the word "white" to imply that there is something clear and pure in and around the buildings.

What is the driving force behind Blair and Bush?

What has been driving the push for Anglo-American dominance?

There is a clue in the street plan of Washington DC.

Below is a section of the original street plan of Washington DC submitted to George Washington and agreed to by George Washington.

To the North of the White(?) House is a pentagram (see the red image). However, this is no ordinary pentagram. This a seriously bad pentagram.

When George Washington was looking over the submitted and finally accepted plan he was a Freemason, the Grand Master of Lodge No. 22 of Alexandria. The home of Freemasonry is London. The man who had submitted the accepted plan was also a Freemason, as well as a war colleague and friend of George Washington.

The above pentagram is seriously bad because it is the complete perversion of the good.

The good pentagram has the two points at the bottom, has arcs/lines of equal length, and all arcs/lines present in full.

The pentagram over the White House is the opposite. It is inverted (two points at the top), irregular (lines of unequal length) and incomplete (not all lines join up).

The Freemasonic historian Manly P Hall in his "Secret Teachings of All Ages" looks at the occult use of the pentagram. Here is what he has to say;
In symbolism, an inverted figure always signifies a perverted power. The average person does not even suspect the occult properties of emblematic pentacles. On this subject the great Paracelsus has written: "No doubt many will scoff at the seals, their characters and their uses, which are described in these books, because it seems incredible to them that metals and characters which are dead should have any power and effect. Yet no one has ever proved that the metals and also the characters as we know them are dead, for the salts, sulphur, and quintessences of metals are the highest preservatives of human life and are far superior to all other simples." (Translated from the original German.)

The black magician cannot use the symbols of white magic without bringing down upon himself the forces of white magic, which would be fatal to his schemes. He must therefore distort the hierograms so that they typify the occult fact that he himself is distorting the principles for which the symbols stand. Black magic is not a fundamental art; it is the misuse of an art. Therefore it has no symbols of its own. It merely takes the emblematic figures of white magic, and by inverting and reversing them signifies that it is left-handed.

A good instance of this practice is found in the pentagram, or five-pointed star, made of five connected lines. This figure is the time-honored symbol of the magical arts, and signifies the five properties of the Great Magical Agent, the five senses of man, the five elements of nature, the five extremities of the human body. By means of the pentagram within his own soul, man not only may master and govern all creatures inferior to himself, but may demand consideration at the hands of those superior to himself.

The pentagram is used extensively in black magic, but when so used its form always differs in one of three ways: The star may be broken at one point by not permitting the converging lines to touch; it may be inverted by having one point down and two up; or it may be distorted by having the points of varying lengths. When used in black magic, the pentagram is called the "sign of the cloven hoof," or the footprint of the Devil. The star with two points upward is also called the "Goat of Mendes," because the inverted star is the same shape as a goat's head. When the upright star turns and the upper point falls to the bottom, it signifies the fall of the Morning Star.

Note that Hall states that the black magician usually perverts the good pentagram in one of three ways. This White House pentagram is perverted in all three possible ways.

How perverted is that?

Using Hall's words the White House pentagram is
INVERTED - having one point down and two up
IRREGULAR - distorted by having the points of varying lengths
INCOMPLETE - broken at one point by not permitting the converging lines to touch

So when you lie in bed at night thinking about how shit the world is think of that inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram above/ruling the White House and ask yourself,


Who are the black magicians of the USA?


The truth is they are not.

The Sunday Times today has an article by David Leppard entitled, "Agent says MI5 dismissed Hamza as ‘harmless clown’".

MI5 had an agent inside Finsbury Park mosque called Reda Hassaine. Hassaine was telling his MI5 handler, Steve, that Abu Hamza
"was brainwashing people and sending them to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, that he was preaching jihad and murder and that he was involved in the provision of false passports. I told them he was a chief terrorist,”. .

But apparently MI5 thought Hamza a 'harmless clown'!

According to Leppard
Hassaine said he even offered to wear a small camera and recording device while he was inside the mosque talking to Hamza and fellow militants. “They [MI5] told me not to bother, that they weren’t interested.”

Recall a few weeks ago the leak to the same newspaper The Sunday Times that Mohammed Siddique Kahn had been placed under surveillance after returning from a known terrorist training camp and was heard talking of joining the Jihad and committing fraud to raise funds for terrorism. But Kahn was not deemed a threat to national security and the surveillance was allegedly removed. MI5 had bigger fish to catch, apparently (I suggest anti-war movement, anti-GM protestors etc).

Since that leak it has been learned that Saudi Arabia had warned MI5 of a terrorist attack on the London Underground shortly before 7/7 and that Kahn may have been involved. And yet a week after the leak on the surveillance of Kahn another leak claimed MI5 had run out of leads and didn't know what to do next.

Is this incompetence?

Can you not see a pattern developing?

This is the secret organisation tasked with defending the realm. It has access to unbelievable surveillance technology and has had for years. They keep terrorising us with warnings that catastrophic terror is just around the corner and claiming they need more money and power to stop it. But in the last month or so it has become crystal clear that MI5 cannot be this incompetent, and must be allowing the terror to occur. They and their masters have everything to gain from this; a police state.

Too much terror and the general public will ask questions. Too little terror and we, the ordinary tax-paying public, have lots and lots of freedom and happiness.

But the odd terror event, the Goldilocks event, is just right.

When I first heard of the BBC series "Spooks" I thought, aye, aye, here's a bit of propaganda. In "Spooks" the intelligence services were honourable, incorruptable and always got their man/woman. Our country is in safe hands, was the message.


In The Sunday Times Amir Tahiri argues that Great Britain has become a haven for Islamic political parties and movements that would be banned in much of the Arab world. London has been known as Londonistan for years. But this association of London and international terror is not new. Webster Tarpley argues, and what research I have done confirms, that during the 19th century Great Britain was inspiring and fostering the international terror movements that swept across Europe and Russia assassinating royalty and ministers of state while sweet FA occured in Great Britain. This international terrorism played a major part in expanding the British Empire's global control.

I am no supporter of the BNP, but we must compare this latest claim from Reda Hassaine with the treatment of the BNP. The BNP was infiltrated by a BBC reporter and its leadership secretly filmed talking candidly of their feelings and views on Islam. A documentary of this was shown on the BBC and charges of inciting racial hatred were made against the BNP leadership, which have since been dismissed. And yet there are several Islamic extremist papers inciting terrorism which are available by mail order. In an article entitled "Business as Usual in the UK" published in Front Page Magazine 20th July 2005 and available at

Dr Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote of the Islamic extremism based in the UK, and named several publications inciting terrorism and suicide bombings (though how Ehrenfeld, as a member of the neoconservative Committee on Present Danger cannot see why these publications are permitted is beyond me).

But I ask you, why are these publications allowed to be published, sold and distributed in the UK, while documentaries on the BNP trying to expose their leadership as Islamophobes are shown on the BBC leading to trials of incitement to racial hatred?

It does not make sense, does it?


It is the argument of myself, and many others, that international Islamic terrorism was being protected and was allowed to grow here in the UK for the benefit of a few people, the same people who brought us World Wars 1 and 2, and are about to kick off World War 3 through this terrorism. This clamping down on Islamic extremism is only for show. The genie is out the bottle now. We've had 9/11 and 7/7.

Is there anything we as ordinary members of the public can do to stop this?

Friday, February 10, 2006

Understanding the Roots of the Prophet Mohammed Cartoon Scandal

Chris Bollyn has posted another article on the Prophet Mohammed cartoon scandal.


MIAMI, Florida – After Danish embassies in three Muslim nations were attacked and set alight by angry mobs protesting the anti-Islamic cartoons published in a Danish newspaper the mainstream media turned its attention to the controversial images and the violent reactions they provoked. Invariably, however, the controlled press overlooked the important fact that the offensive images were commissioned and published by a Danish colleague of the Neo-Con Zionist extremist Daniel Pipes.

The anti-Muslim cartoon scandal has turned out to be a major step forward for the Zionist Neo-Cons and their long-planned "clash of civilizations," the artificially constructed conflict designed to pit the so-called Christian West against the Islamic world.

"The rioting that has erupted across the Middle East…is a predictable if overwrought reaction to what now seems like a calculated offense against Islam," The Miami Herald wrote in its lead editorial on February 7.

"It is not necessary to reprint the offending cartoons for U.S. readers to understand the issue," The Miami Herald, a Knight-Ridder paper, opined wisely. "A religious taboo was violated, and those involved knew full well what they were doing. The incident fell all too neatly into the hands of those who would exacerbate tensions between Europe and the Muslim world."

Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of Jyllands-Posten (JP), is the person who commissioned and published the offensive cartoons knowing full well that the images would exacerbate tensions between Europe and the Islamic nations. Rose is a colleague of the Neo-Con Daniel Pipes who visited the Philadelphia office of Pipes' Zionist website called Middle East Forum in 2004.

Rose then penned a sympathetic article about Pipes entitled "The Threat from Islamism," which promoted his extreme anti-Islamic views without even mentioning the fact that Pipes is a rabid Zionist extremist.

Pipes, the son of the Polish-born Jewish Neo-Con professor Richard E. Pipes, is a Zionist of the most extreme sort, who says that the Palestinian people need to have a "change of heart" that should be brought about after being utterly defeated by the Israeli military.

"How is a change of heart achieved? It is achieved by an Israeli victory and a Palestinian defeat," Pipes said in 2003. "The Palestinians need to be defeated even more than Israel needs to defeat them."

After three Danish embassies were attacked by angry Muslim mobs, CNN turned to Daniel Pipes, its carefully chosen Middle East analyst, to explain the cause of the widespread anger in the Muslim world. Rather than discuss the origin of the anti-Muslim images, which had provoked the protests, Pipes blamed radical clerics for having circulated the offensive images.

CNN failed to mention that Pipes and Rose are Zionist Neo-Con colleagues while Pipes blamed Muslims for the violent protests, saying that "extremists" had used the offensive cartoons published by Rose "to rally their people and become more agitatedly anti-Western."

This theory of a deliberate provocation of Islam is confirmed in an article on the World Socialist Website which looks at this affair.


Last autumn Jyllands-Posten assigned 40 prominent Danish caricaturists to draw the Prophet Muhammad. Twelve responded and the results were published on September 30. The project was deliberately designed to provoke.

According to the cultural editor of the newspaper, Flemming Rose, it was aimed at “testing the limits of self-censorship in Danish public opinion” when it comes to Islam and Muslims. He added: “In a secular society, Muslims have to live with the fact of being ridiculed, scoffed at and made to look ridiculous.”

When the anticipated reaction by the Muslim community failed to arise, the newspaper continued its campaign, determined to create a full-scale scandal. After a week had gone by without protest, journalists turned on Danish Islamic religious leaders who were well known for their fundamentalist views and demanded: “Why don’t you protest?” Eventually, the latter reacted and alerted their co-thinkers in the Middle East.

But before the cartoons were published attempts at incitement were being made by Jyllands-Posten.

In the 1990s the decidedly conservative paper increasingly developed into a mouthpiece for openly xenophobic, right-wing forces. Nearly a quarter of the editorial board was dismissed, and the quality of the paper sank as its aggressiveness rose.

Shortly before the publication of the Muhammad cartoons, Jyllands-Posten ran a headline reading, “Islam is the Most Belligerent.” The newspaper ran an exposé about an alleged Muslim death-list of Jewish names—until it emerged that the whole thing was a fabrication.

One year ago the editor-in-chief resigned because the newspaper carried a report, in the midst of an election campaign, alleging the systematic abuse of welfare rights by asylum-seekers. The sensational charges were published against his will.

We now also learn that Jyllands-Posten will not publish the cartoons of the holohoax commissioned by an Iranian newspaper.

It looks to me like a deliberate provocation and incitement, and Islam fell for it.


Over the last few years a number of people have volunteered to be microchipped.

But now 'chipping is becoming compulsory. How soon before we are all forced to be 'chipped? You may have laughed at that question when 'chipping was first carried out on animals. The people who are running the planet see you as just as animal.

I believe that the investment in the mobile phone networks is not just for mobile phones, but to develop tracking networks for when we all get chipped. The microwave frequencies also do your brain in (see the work of Allan Frey and Ross Adey).


Cincinnati video surveillance company now requires employees to use VeriChip human implantable microchips to enter a secure data center, Network Administrator Khary Williams told Liz McIntyre by phone yesterday. McIntyre, co-author of "Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID," contacted CityWatcher after it announced it had integrated the VeriChip VeriGuard product into its access control system.

The VeriChip is a glass encapsulated RFID tag that is injected into the flesh of the triceps area of the arm to uniquely number and identify individuals. The tag can be read through a person's clothing, silently and invisibly, by radio waves from a few inches away. The highly controversial device is being marketed as a way to access secure areas, link to medical records, and serve as a payment instrument when associated with a credit card.

According to Williams, a local doctor has already implanted two of CityWatcher's employees with the VeriChip devices. "I will eventually" receive an implant, too, he added. In the meantime, Williams accesses the data center with a VeriChip implant housed in a heart-shaped plastic casing that hangs from his keychain. He told McIntyre he had no qualms about undergoing the implantation procedure himself, and said he would receive an implant as soon as time permits.

"lt worries us that a government contractor that specializes in surveillance projects would be the first to publicly incorporate this technology in the workplace," said McIntyre. CityWatcher provides video surveillance, monitoring and video storage for government and businesses, with cameras set up on public streets throughout Cincinatti.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006


Following the debacle of the trial of Abu Hamza and the subsequent questions of "why the hell did it take so long to cage him" coming from The Sun et al, here is an article that probes warnings of terrorism given to British Intelligence.

Hamza was going to be tried in 1999, but apprently there was not enough evidence (though I heard that he was convicted this time on basically the same evidence). Hamza was based at Finsbury Park Mosque, where he interacted with Abu Qatada. Shortly after 9/11 Qatada was whisked away to a safe house by British Intelligence and offered all sorts of incentives to leave for Afghanistan. Qatada had quite a close relationship with MI5, as did Hamza as given in his testimony.

The following article states that
A statement issued in August 2005 by Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi ambassador to the UK, confirmed, “There was certainly close liaison between the Saudi Arabian intelligence authorities and the British intelligence authorities some months ago when information was passed to Britain about a heightened terrorist threat to London.”

The Saudi intelligence is said to be based on information obtained from intercepted mobile phone calls from Kareem al-Majati, named as one of Al Qaeda’s leaders in the region, to Mohammed Siddiqui Kahn, who headed the four-man terrorist cell that detonated the London bombs.

According to the Observer, a Saudi official said, “It was clear to us that there was a terror group planning an attack in the UK. We passed all this information on to both MI5 and MI6 at the time. We are now investigating whether these calls were directly to the London bombers. It is our conclusion that either these were linked, or that a completely different terror network is still at large in Britain.”

A few weeks ago The Sunday Times reported leaks that Kahn had been under surveillance for a month but, despite being heard talking of Jihad and committing fraud to fund terrorism and having returned from a known terrorist training camp, he was not deemed a threat to national security. The Saudi intelligence hints that Kahn was in contact with a known al-Qaeda leader and that MI5 was informed of this.

So this begs the question, was the investigation into Kahn reopened? If not, why not?

It has been clear to many nations besides ours that London has been a centre for Islamic terrorism, hence the name Londonistan.

MI5 can offer the excuse for keeping the likes of Hamza on our streets because they can watch what he is doing and who contacts him, which could lead to other networks etc.

This looks more and more like 7/7 was allowed to happen.

Kahn was heard talking of joining in Jihad
Saudis tell MI5 Kahn is talking to an al-Qaeda leader in Saudi Arabia about a bomb plot on London Underground.

So what happened?

A second leak in The Sunday Times reported that MI5 have run out of leads in their 7/7 investigation and don't know what to do! But they continue to terrorise us with further warnings of terrorist attacks.

Yeah, they know they're coming because they're listening in and allowing it to happen.

I am not accusing the whole of MI5, just a clique within, a rotten core.


Saudi Arabia alerted Britain of terror attack prior to London bombings
By Richard Tyler
8 February 2006

According to US intelligence sources, British officials received a credible warning months before the July 2005 London bombings, which killed 52 people.

An article in the February 5 Observer cites senior White House sources confirming that very specific information issued by Saudi intelligence authorities in early 2005 was passed on to Britain. Saudi intelligence reported that there was a bomb plot involving four Islamic militants, some of whom would be British citizens. The bombers could target the London Underground within the next six months.

Tuesday, February 07, 2006


Knock me down with a feather!

The laptop and several papers of Lord Stevens, who is about to report on his investigation into the death of Princess Diana, have been stolen during TWO break-ins at his office in Gosforth, Newcastle.

Over the weekend it was reported in The Daily Express that there was a brilliant flash in the tunnel just before the car carrying Diana and Dodi crashed, and Lord Stevens has said the investigation is "more complex" than expected.

There are several reasons put forward Diana's death. One is that she was actually destined from birth to die in her eventual sacrifice! Another reason is that she was about to blow the lid on the Windsor family secrets. Yet another is that she was a loose cannon.

A very good analysis of Diana's death is by David Icke in "The Biggest Secret".

There is no doubt she was murdered. The exact reason as to why is arguable. Perhaps there isn't just one reason.

The one reason I can definitely accept as valid is that she was pregnant and that she was not supposed to die. The crash was designed to kill the child and Dodi. The father of the child was Dodi. As Diana was the nations favourite it would not have helped if she had a child of Arabian descent, particularly as we now seem determined to engulf the Middle East in war.



A COMPUTER belonging to the man leading the inquiry into Princess Diana's death has been stolen in a burglary. (?)

It has been widely predicted that Lord Stevens' findings could be sensational.
He has already warned in a TV interview that the investigation, known as Operation Paget, is "more complex" than thought.

A source close to Lord Stevens confirmed computer equipment had been stolen, including a laptop and personal papers, in two raids within a week at his office in Gosforth, Newcastle.


Merete Eldrup, the MD of the company owning Jyllands-Posten, is married to a regular fixture at Bilderberg, Anders Eldrup.

The company owning Jyllands-Posten is JP/Politikens Hus A/S. It also owns the Danish newspaper Politiken. Its editor-in-chief is Toger Seidenfaden. Seidenfaden has attended Bilderberg every year since 1995. He has also attended several Trilateral Commission meetings this decade.

How does this man explain to his MD, Merete Eldrup, what he is doing for a few days every May? (that's when Bilderberg meets). I guess he doesn't need to because her husband Anders Eldrup is there to hold his hand.

Jyllands-Posten and Politiken merged in 2003 and claim to have separate editorial policies.

I wonder how independent those editorial policies really are?

It was Politiken who first published the story that the author Bluitgen could not find an illustrator for his book called "Islam and the life of the Prophet Mohammed". This, so the story goes, then led to Flemming Rose requesting cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed.

The current Prime Minister of Denmark, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, attended Bilderberg in 2000 and became Prime Minister a year later. This happened to Blair and Clinton. You attend Bilderberg one year and become leader of your country the next. Bilderberg really are excellent "talent spotters"! Rasmussen also attended Bilderberg in 2003, and supported the war on Iraq.

It was Rasmussen who refused to issue an apology to the Muslim community, thus leading to the breakdown in international relations between Islam and the rest of the world (as it was supposed to for the coming "clash of civilizations" which Iran is now adding to).

If you go to the excellent website on Bilderberg run by Tony Gosling at
you can find list of attendees to these exclusive annual meetings.

In the last 20 years, only a handful of Danish men have attended Bilderberg. Three of them are intimately involved in the origin of this breakdown.


What is Ahmedinejad playing at?

In "retaliation" for the publication and republication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed Iran is holding an international competition in cartoons of the Holocaust.


Iran paper plans Holocaust cartoons

Monday 06 February 2006, 20:00 Makka Time, 17:00 GMT

Ahmadinejad says the slaughter of Europe's Jews is 'a myth'

Iran's largest selling newspaper has announced it is holding a contest on cartoons of the Holocaust in response to the publishing in European papers of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad.

"It will be an international cartoon contest about the Holocaust," Farid Mortazavi, the graphics editor for Hamshahri newspaper, which is published by Tehran's conservative-run municipality, said on Monday.

He said the plan was to turn the tables on the assertion that newspapers can print offensive material in the name of freedom of expression.

"The Western papers printed these sacrilegious cartoons on the pretext of freedom of expression, so let's see if they mean what they say and also print these Holocaust cartoons," he asserted.

This really is getting childish. The Islamic world has just been rioting and burning over an abuse of free speech. And now an Iranian paper is going to fan the flames even more and do the same thing! This is bordering on hypocrisy.

When Ahmedinejad said that Israel should be wiped off the map a thought crossed my mind that maybe he was a Zionist agent. This adds to that feeling.

I'm no fan of Israel, but I'm no fan of Islam either. Both are being incited to clash. That's why Israel was created in the first place.

Monday, February 06, 2006


The cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed as a suicide bomber etc were first published in Denamrk by Jyllands-Posten on 30th January 2005. Jyllands-Posten is owned by JP/Politikens Hus. The Mangaging Director of JP/Politikens Hus is Merete Eldrup. Merete Eldrup is the wife of Anders Eldrup who has attended the last FIVE Bilderberg meetings.

Several European newspapers then decided to republish some, if not all, of the cartoons, knowing that several Muslim organisations in Denmark were requesting an apology for the initial publication, death threats were being made against editors, economic sanctions were being suggested, and diplomats were being withdrawn.

To republish the cartoons was pouring petrol onto a smouldering fire.

Among the newspapers republishing the cartoons were Die Welt and La Stampa.

Die Welt is owned by Axel Springer Verlag. The CEO of Axel Springer is Matthias Dopfner who attended Bilderberg last year.

La Stampa is owned by Fiat, which is owned by the Agnellis who ARE Bilderberg. Their representative at Bilderberg last year was John Elkann.

Several questions need answering.
1. was Merete Eldrup aware that the cartoons were to be published before they were published? WHat conversations have there been between Eldrup and Flemming Rose?
2. was there any agreed coordination between La Stampa and Die Welt relating to their publication of the cartoons?
3. how did the Imams finance their tour of the Middle East and the publication of a dossier?
4. were any agents provocatuers in the protesting crowds to turn the peaceful demonstrations into arson attacks on Embassies? [a number cover their faces]
5. why did the UK police allow the protestors to carry such inflammatory placards, thus leading to photographs of the protestors with their vitriolic placards being published all over the papers?

The result of the publication and republication of these cartoons has played into the hands of those who want war, be it a clash of civilizations, or to demonize Islam.

The leaders of Islam really need to get control of their youth. Can't they see they are being provoked?

Sunday, February 05, 2006


The cartoons that have recently angered Muslims into burning down embassies were published in Autumn last year in Jyllands-Posten, and there was some but not much protest. Some Danish Muslims then exaggerated the effect the cartoons were having by going on a tour of the Middle East and adding some of their own cartoons, one depicting the Prophet Mohammed as a pig, to add to the mess.

But then this last week things have really took off after several of the cartoons were published in some european dailies.

The following papers printed some of the cartoons; Die Welt, France Soir, La Stampa, El Periodico, and Volkskrant.

According to the BBC Die Welt is one of the eight main papers in Germany. Die Welt is owned by Axel Springer Verlag whose CEO is Matthias Dopfner who attended Bilderberg last year (along with new Chancellor Angela Merkel).

Also according to the BBC La Stampa is one six national dailies. La Stampa is owned by Fiat Group, which is owned by the Agnellis who ARE Bilderberg.

Of France Soir, El Periodico, and Volkskrant I can find no Bilderberg link.
France Soir is owned by Raymond Lakah. Who is he?
El Periodico is owned by Ediciones Primera Plana and I cannot find much about them.
Volkskrant is owned by PCM Uitgevers, in which Apax Partners has a 52% majority share.

Any further info on these three papers and their owners would be useful.

Further info on the imams who have stoked the Muslim fires with their forged cartoons would also be useful.

It is becoming apparent that there is a possibility that a wedge is being driven betwen Europe and Islam. The original publication of the cartoons did not have the effect it should have.

So why has the story become a global event, with several european papers publishing the cartoons 4 months after their original publication and some Danish imams forging extra cartoons to incite Muslims?

It smells very fishy to me.

Thursday, February 02, 2006


I was over on Rachel of North London's blog the other day trying to get her and her readers to understand the basic history of the United Nations; that the two attempts at world government, the League of Nations and the United Nations, were tried after the trauma of a world war. These wars did not just happen, but were engineered by the Anglo-American Establishment for this purpose (as well as to destroy their main opponents, Germany and Russia, and to make a nice little profit too).

I think the Anglo-American Establishment are well behind in their plan for global governance, possiby expecting us to have ceded most, if not all, of our sovereignty to the UN by now. This is why I think we now have the neocon "fucking crazies" in power in the USA. Their plan is for total, relentless war. As stated, the LN and UN were only accepted after the trauma of world wars, lasting 4 and 6 six years.

So how will we feel in 10 years time, 20 years time, after the USA and its partner-in-crime the UK have been invading here, there and everywhere on false pretences?

You may well have noted of late a similar relentlessness on the threat global warming poses to humanity.

Other proposed global threats are global pandemics, such as H5N1, and AIDS.

Global threats require global solutions i.e. international cooperation.

So the UN has stepped in to offer to save us from these "threats".

The Independent reports at
that the UN could save the day!

The most potent threats to life on earth - global warming, health pandemics, poverty and armed conflict - could be ended by moves that would unlock $7 trillion - $7,000,000,000,000 (£3.9trn) - of previously untapped wealth, the United Nations claims today.

The price? An admission that the nation-state is an old-fashioned concept that has no role to play in a modern globalised world where financial markets have to be harnessed rather than simply condemned.

Readers of leaks from Bilderberg are aware that a global taxation to finance the expansion of the UN has been suggested at Bilderberg meetings.

The neocons are not the only part of the problem. They only play a small part in threatening endless global warfare, while we are also threatened with other global threats such as global warming, pandemics, international terrorism etc.

Anything global can be, and is being, used to break down national borders, allowing the expansion of the UN.


A few paragraphs from the State of the Union Speech of January 31st 2006.

The same is true of Iran, a nation now held hostage by a small clerical elite that is isolating and repressing its people. The regime in that country sponsors terrorists in the Palestinian territories and in Lebanon -- and that must come to an end.

Let's turn this around and look at the USA.
The same is true of Iran [USA], a nation now held hostage by a small clerical[small East Coast banking and oiligarchical] elite that is isolating and repressing its people [with the Patriot Act, surveillance, harrassment]. The regime [East Coast banking and oiligarchical elite] in that country [USA] sponsors terrorists in the Palestinian territories and in Lebanon [sponsors terrorists across the globe] -- and that must come to an end [Amen to that].

OK, now to the customary reference to 9/11.
It is said that prior to the attacks of September the 11th, our government failed to connect the dots of the conspiracy. We now know that two of the hijackers in the United States placed telephone calls to al Qaeda operatives overseas. But we did not know about their plans until it was too late. So to prevent another attack –- based on authority given to me by the Constitution and by statute -- I have authorized a terrorist surveillance program to aggressively pursue the international communications of suspected al Qaeda operatives and affiliates to and from America. Previous Presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have, and federal courts have approved the use of that authority. Appropriate members of Congress have been kept informed. The terrorist surveillance program has helped prevent terrorist attacks. It remains essential to the security of America. If there are people inside our country who are talking with al Qaeda, we want to know about it, because we will not sit back and wait to be hit again. (Applause.)

We now also know that the WTC towers were brought down via a professional demolition with explosives, as any number of witnesses at Ground Zero testify with photographic evidence too. We now also know that the Project for a New American Century were desperate for "a new Pearl Harbour", an event that would galvanize US public opinion into supporting pre-emptive wars.

And as for freedom and democracy?
Far from being a hopeless dream, the advance of freedom is the great story of our time. In 1945, there were about two dozen lonely democracies in the world. Today, there are 122. And we're writing a new chapter in the story of self-government -- with women lining up to vote in Afghanistan, and millions of Iraqis marking their liberty with purple ink, and men and women from Lebanon to Egypt debating the rights of individuals and the necessity of freedom.

What is the definition of democracy that Bush is using? US democracy means that the US usually has to select a President who is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, a child of the British Monarchy's Royal Institute of International Affairs. And before the CFR was created in 1921 there was good chance the President was a Freemason, again also controlled by the British Monarchy.

And as for the fledgling democracies of Iraq and Afghanistan. The Taliban was a creature of CIA and Pakistani ISI. Saddam was also a creature of the CIA. Is the CIA creating tyrannies giving it the excuse to invade and impose US-style democracy?

Afghanistan's President is Hamid Karzai. Afghanistan was invaded under the pretext that it was protecting Osama bin Laden and was a home to the terrorists who orchestrated 9/11, not for democracy. Democracy has become the secondary reason since they let bin Laden et al escape. Karzai, a former consultant to Unocal who wanted to build a pipeline across Afghanistan, was appointed leader and is on the periphery of the neoconservatives.

Iraq was invaded under the pretext of WMD and alleged involvement in 9/11, not for democracy. Democracy has become the secondary reason since, unsurprisingly, no WMDs have been found. In fact Blair said in Parliament that Saddam could stay in power if he gave up his WMDs! And Saddam was sold any WMD he may have had by the West! And inspections revealed he had no stockpiles of any significance - out of date, rusty, useless stuff. And why did Bush I leave Saddam in power in 1991 and help destroy his internal enemy by inciting them to rebel against Saddam and then leave the rebels out to dry i.e. get massacred? Now contracts are being drawn up that give Western oil corps massive profits taking Iraqi wealth out of Iraq, decades after the USA and UK bombed Iraq into the stone age during the 1990's under the pretence of protecting a no-fly zone, and killing hundreds of thousands of civilians in the process while CIA agent Saddam sat in an extremely well protected Palace surrounded by fine furniture etc. And who is sharking around in the Iraqi government? Ahmed Chalabi, the source for a number of scare stories regarding Iraq's invisible WMDs. Chalabi was head of the Iraqi National Congress, based in London and receiving substantial British and American support. Chalabi was briefly in charge of Iraqi oil.

And as for America's "democratic" ally, Isarel? Israel is an apartheid state.

What a joke!

Wednesday, February 01, 2006


Yesterday a former RUC detective Johnston Brown was interviewed on BBC Radio 4's Take A Stand radio programme.

Brown has been hounded out of the RUC, with death threats and bombs.

Brown knows the true story behind the murder of Pat Finucane, that Special Branch knew that Finucane was going to be murdered and by whom but did nothing to stop it. He also tells of an incident when he arrested three Loyalists with guns and Special Branch were not happy.

So what? He believes that "sinister elements" within Special Branch are still out to kill him.

Does this show that this collusion between Special Branch and the Loyalist terrorists is just "protecting the realm" so to speak? Or were these "sinister elements" within Special Branch being used by an even more "sinister element" within British Intelligence that wanted terrorism to continue, by provoking Irish Republican terrorists into committing atrocities, thus leading to a fearful population ready to accept a Police State?

The BBC introduced the show with the following;
Fergal Keane talks to different individuals who, through personal conviction or circumstances, have taken a stand against something significant. What motivated them to act and what was the fallout of the decision?

Fergal Keane talks to Johnston Brown, a former RUC detective. When he joined the Royal Ulster Constabulary at the height of 'the Troubles' in the early 1970s, Johnston Brown thought he would be bringing criminals to justice.

Instead, he claims that he found instances of collusion between Special Branch officers and informers. Johnston Brown tells Fergal Keane about why he decided to speak out.

Into the Dark, by Johnston Brown, is published by Gill Macmillan, ISBN: 0717139506