So the righteous Prezza allegedly had sex in his office while the door was open, and Clarke erroneously allowed several hundred foreign criminals to avoid deportation, some of whom have committed crimes again.SCANDALOUS!!
Well, no. Lets' get all this into perspective.
During the 1990's while the Tories were in power and before Labour came to office only two member's of the Parliamentary Labour Party were invited to Bilderberg meetings; current Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown in 1991, and current Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1993. The positions these two men hold are arguably the two most powerful positions in government. Is it just 'a coincidence' that Brown and Blair were invited, and nobody else, and that they now hold these two positions? Or is it, as Bilderberg Chairman Etienne Davignon claims, that Bilderberg are just "excellent talent spotters"?
[By the way, Blair has lied to Parliament about the attendance of himself and Brown to these Bilderberg meetings.]
So what is Bilderberg? If you ask the likes of Jon Ronson he'll say it's a meeting of 'Jewish Lizards'. In reality if you look at the attendance list you will find it is a meeting run by the most powerful fractional reserve bankers (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg) to interview potential candidates for political office so that the chosen ppoliticians continue the agenda of the fractional reserve bankers. The Steering Committee decides who is invited, approximately 100 of 'the great and the good' from Europe and the USA. It is widely believed that one, if not the main, objective of Bilderberg is to create One Europe Government
as a stepping stone towards One World Government
. In support of this thesis John Monks was the only other person from the UK 'left', besides Blair and Brown, to be invited, in 1996, before the 1997 Labour victory. Then Monks was the General Secretary of the TUC. Now Monks is the General Secretary of the European
TUC, a member of the Councils of the European
Policy Centre, Brussels and the Center for European
Studies, London. But he is also a Trustee of The Friends of Europe
. But who is the President of The Friends of Europe? It is currently Etienne Davignon
who is also currently the Honorary Chairman of Bilderberg! There are quite a few regular Bilderbergers who are also Trustees of The Friends of Europe e.g. Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, and Carl Bildt. So Monks is a big
Europe man, and there is no way he would have been invited in the first place and also be where he is today if the bankers didn't like what he said.
If you get invited to Bilderberg, you have a chance to make it. But if you say the right things you will
make it. For example Bill Clinton at Bilderberg 1991, made President of USA 1992. Brown and Blair at Bilderberg early 1990's, now Chancellor and Prime Minister of Great Britain for over two terms in office.
Why? What is so special about the people who control Bilderberg?
Along with the bankers who control it, or their representatives, there are always, always, always members of the press e.g. The Economist
, The Times
, The Financial Times
, The Daily Telegraph
. But if there are always members of the press in attendance then why do you read about, for example, Prezza and Clarke, and not hear anything about Bilderberg, or for that matter, fractional reserve banking
Well, I'll ask again; Who has the power to create as much money as they want to buy, or even create new, media outlets? Who owns Reuters? Rupert Murdoch is a Bilderberger. Conrad Black, former owner of The Daily Telegraph
is also a Bilderberger.
These people control what you read, hear and see with regards to the news, and thus what you think. They can make or break politicians. They can also create diversions
, to take your mind off potentially damaging news.
So why do you not read about who has the power to create money while you eat your cornflakes, but you can read about Prezza getting a blow job from his sexretary who was hiding under the desk?
Or what would you rather read while you eat your cornflakes?
So what if Clarke goes?
So what if Prezza goes?
If one goes another clone will take their place and the merry-go-round/musical chairs continues.
As Josiah Stamp stated, as long as we allow the bankers to create money at will they will always use that power to buy and/or control media to influence your vote to put people like their chosen one Blair in place so that people like Blair can put people like Clarke in place to bring in ID Cards/database.
Let's get this straight. The ID Card/database is not Clarke's idea. Clarke is a stooge for it. The ID Card/database idea was thought up years ago, before Clarke was born. IBM helped the Nazis to create an ID Card/database state. I would guess that it is the furore over ID Cards that diverted Clarke from sorting out the foreign prisoner scandal. But as Labour have suggested it is Labour who were the first to introduce the system, so who knows how many have avoided deportation under previous governments, Tory or Labour?
So, what's more important? Clarke fired to be replaced by another clone selected by Bilderberg's chosen one Blair to continue the rush towards a Police State? Or to take the money-creating power from the bankers so they stop selecting people like Brown and Blair to be our leaders years before they enter office and then use their influence over the media to get their chosen ones into office to continue the banker's agenda (oh, and not forgetting putting everyone and everything into eternal debt slavery)?
It's upto you.