From http://www.respectcoalition.org/?ite=1304
"...Let me invite the House to contemplate this and see if I am as right about this as I was about Iraq four years ago. If a finger is raised against Iran by Israel or the United States, the first people to pay the price will be the 7,000 young men and women of the British armed forces that we have stationed in the south of Iraq, where Iran, thanks to us, is now top dog. If Members want to know what that will look like, think about the film "Zulu", but without the happy ending. That is how irresponsible our Government are. They are part of an axis that is contemplating a war against a country that we have made powerful in a place where we have our soldiers standing in a thin red line in the sand.
For the moment, the trial of Tony Blair merely takes place on Channel 4 television. The day will come, and it is coming soon, when a real trial of Tony Blair will take place in a real court."
2 comments:
Some of the evidence presented by the committee, the "testimony" of Tariq Aziz, has been debunked. Aziz was under US custody, and instructed his lawyer to deny all claims that the committee said he made.
This then brings into question the whole report, does it not? It was published October 2005. On its publication Galloway PLEADED with Coleman et al to not just accuse of him of perjury, but to actually prosecute him.
To date this has not occcured.
Thus I can draw a conclusion; the report is a fake, and was designed to do exatly what Galloway said, to distract from the lies, manipulation and death in Iraq.
BTW, guess who is getting that lovely black oily prize?
Not Galloway, but Exxon etc.
The people who run the Council on Foreign Relations and the fraudulent Federal Reserve.
In that case why has Galloway not been prosecuted? Surely if the documents were 100% authentic the neocon regime for whom Coleman is a front would have immediately PROSECUTED Galloway and would delight in printing photos of Galloway behind bars.
Again, to date that, 15 months after their publication, that prosecution has not happened.
One has to ask why.
Have you ever wondered why?
Do you accept that tha Aziz statements were fabricated?
And if so, does that not raise doubts about the authenticity of the whole report?
Do they not have the confidence in their "evidence", some of which has been proven as fabricated?
It is interesting that Citibank is part of the Rockefeller empire, as is Exxon who stadnd to make billions from Iraqi oil. Lloyds is Rothschild. Hmm.
When Galloway is in an American court being prosecuted for perjury then I'll be interested in this. Otherwise because of (a) the fabricated Aziz statements, and (b) the lack of prosecution but wealth of accusations, I believe there is a frame-up of Galloway, probably to divert attention from the real crime in Iraq; the hydrocarbon law.
How do you feel about the lies we were told regarding Iraq's oil, when we read that the Anglo-American oil corporations are goin to get it, and not the Iraqi people as we were told?
Post a Comment