Tuesday, March 31, 2009


Can we organize an alternative Remembrance Day, alternative to the sickening parade we have thrust down our throats every Remembrance Sunday?

I want to remember and salute the brave soldiers who died in the wars, and those still alive, but not with the pomp and circumstance.

We know that the wars they fought and died in were engineered, that they did not just happen.

That fact has got to be remembered, and remembered first and forever.


Imagine how Josef Fritzl's abused children must have felt like upon seeing daylight, after having been locked away for years. They only knew those four walls and the abuse from their father.

The human race has also been abused for longer, centuries, locked away in a prison conciousness of virtual reality tv, films and soaps, and lies and trivia from the media whores.

For centuries we've believed that things just happen.

For centuries we've believed that there isn't a better world, and if there was then we don't deserve it.

For centuries we've believed that we are useless, helpless, beyond redemption, and must accept our lot without question.


We know.

We know who.

We know how.

We know why.

And we don't like it.


When will our glorious and 100% trustworthy Prime Minister get it?

When will he understand that a very, very dangerous cabal of monsters have been gifted control of our money supply and have abused that God-like power for centuries, to engineer and finance world wars and then to screw us for trillions and trillions?

Wagging his finger at them, saying to them, "Naughty bankers. Bad bankers. Don't do it again", just will not work with these types. We've seen their attitude with recent reports of the Bullingdon Club. That's the mentality that rules in The City.

Their power must be stripped from them and returned to us, and then lock them all up in jail with Josef Fritzl.

It's dead easy.

Simply apply The Fraud Act 2006 Section 4.

So why won't he do it?

Because he's waiting for his pay off.

He's seen Blair's and thought, "Ooh, I'll have some of that!".

That's the only answer I can think of.

From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1165997/Banks-need-family-values-says-Gordon-Brown-extraordinary-sermon-City-ahead-G20.html

Banks need family values, says Gordon Brown in extraordinary sermon to the City ahead of G20

By James Chapman
Last updated at 1:59 AM on 31st March 2009

Gordon Brown will today make an extraordinary appeal for family values to be applied to the financial system.

The Prime Minister will use a speech at St Paul's Cathedral to insist the first test of this week's G20 summit will be if it can agree to clean up banks across the world.

Mr Brown will call on world leaders to build a market system 'which respects the values we celebrate in our everyday lives'.

It will mark a major shift in focus for the G20 meeting, with proposals for another huge injection of money into the world economy effectively forced off the agenda.

Monday, March 30, 2009


Last year it was revealed that Peter Mandelson holidayed with the Rothschilds, driving their Ferraris, and sailing and dining on their yachts.

I have yet to hear of the Rothschilds as making a significant loss during the current financial crisis.

Today Peter Mandelson wants us to go easy on the bankers. Apparently we need them! And if we are harsh to them and express our feelings towards them then they might not use our bailout money to our benefit, but they may instead just use it for their own benefit.

So hug a banker today. Show them we love them. Show them we know that they, like us, are all God's creatures.


The scandal of The Home Secretary claiming the expense of her husband watching pornography is a symptom of our society as a whole.

Another symptom of our society as a whole is pwarnography.

Some get off watching loveless sex.

Some get off watching loveless war and violence.

Both are being imposed upon us more frequently so that they are fast becoming the norm.

Last week the government proposed adverts for abortion on TV.

And even today there is a report that violent video games are good for eyesight. Forget the carrots, get your kids to play violent video games.

This is happening because you allow it.

If you stood up and shouted "NO!", it would stop.

But you don't.

Enjoy the fruits of your silence.

Saturday, March 28, 2009


Give it 5 years and Wembley will by law have to sing this (or else). It need not be this way. Certain people can very easily refuse to sign treaties and laws ( but for whatever reason they do).

God save our gracious Europe,
Long live our noble Europe,
God save our Europe!
Send her victorious,
Happy and Glorious,
Long to reign over us;
God save our Europe!

O Lord our God arise,
Scatter her enemies
And make them fall;
Confound their politics,
Frustrate their knavish tricks,
On Thee our hopes we fix,
Oh, save us all!

Thy choicest gifts in store
On her be pleased to pour;
Long may she reign;
May she defend our laws,
And ever give us cause
To sing with heart and voice,
God save our Europe!

Not in this land alone,
But be God's mercies known,
From shore to shore!
Lord make the nations see,
That men should brothers be,
And form one family,
The wide world over

From every latent foe,
From the assassins blow,
God save our Europe!
O'er her thine arm extend,
For Europe's sake defend,
Our mother, prince, and friend,
God save our Europe!

Friday, March 27, 2009


Right at the very top, where all the instructions and demands and orders originate, that's what they'll be : white with blue-eyes.


I recently wrote to the Treasury Committee at the UK Parliament asking that a global Pecora Commission be established immediately before the bankers achieve all their aims. In case they had not heard of Ferdinand Pecora or what he did I passed the committee the 4 part essay by Lonnie Wolfe entitled “Morgan's Fascist Plot, and How It Was Defeated” at

The reception has been favourable, and the committee is beginning to establish links with other similar committees across the globe, though with what aim I am unsure.

So if you want to know what the hell happened to all our money and who did what and why then write to the Treasury Committee asap demanding a global Pecora Commission. I believe there is serious interest in such an investigation. It needs to be encouraged before the appetite is lost or other events, such as an attack on Iran, become more important.

Thursday, March 26, 2009


Through your children.

Through your mortgage.

Through your TV.

Through your radio.

Through your newspapers.

Through your electronic activities, such as purchases, communications and browsing.

Through your family and friends, who all regulate each others activities.

How do I control thee? I've lost count of the ways.


If there is one thing the Illuminati want it's abortion.

Abortion is the ultimate in killing; killing your own child. Carnal pleasure followed by murder.

If the aim is pregnancy reduction then show actual abortions, see how horrible it can be, see how it messes up people. Perhaps that will scare both men and women into thinking twice about unprotected sex.

But if the aim is to increase pregnancy termination then show ads for abortion clinics. And that is the aim in this mad suggestion.

The two are different.

NB what did Brown's green advisor Porritt suggest earlier this week? Halve the population, and quickly. Abortion would contribute to that. As would legalized assisted suicide. The ultimate aim is a reduction to 10%-20% of current population levels. And if that means murder of children then so be it. That's the way these people think. We now know how many kids those brave IDF soldiers murdered in Gaza. This cult of death is rearing its ugly head more and more.

Monday, March 23, 2009


A senior manager of J P Morgan Chase, the bank with the largest exposure to derivatives in the world, and a senior Bilderberger Josef Ackermann who is in charge of Deutchse Bank, one the largest banks in Europe, are to meet in number 10 with yet another Bilderberger, our glorious and 100% trustworthy PM Gordon Brown, to discuss the latters proposals to save the world from the financial crisis that they and their Bilderberg buddies engineered.

I do not have 100% faith that they will consider saving the human race as the number one priority but will instead save themselves and the bankrupt and fraudulent banking system that has enslaved the human race for the last several centuries.


From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5956536.ece

Bankers head for No 10 to fix financial world
Suzy Jagger and Francis Elliott

Some of the world’s most powerful banking executives will meet Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling tomorrow to discuss how the global financial system can be repaired.

Among those at the meeting at No 10 will be Bill Winters, the co-head of investment banking at JP Morgan Chase, and either Josef Ackermann, the chairman of Deutsche Bank,or his chief operating officer, Hermann-Josef Lamberti.

The Prime Minister and the Chancellor will show the bankers detailed drafts of proposals that the Government will present at the G20 meeting in London on April 2. Mr Brown’s priorities for banking reform are to stabilise the financial sector, help lenders to purge their books of toxic debt, repair their balance sheets with new capital and build a regulatory structure that would prevent a rerun of the current financial crisis.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009


The Independent is reporting today on a struggle between a salvage company and the British Government over the ownership of the contents of a ship sunk by a German submarine in 1917.

The Laconia was sailing from New York to Liverpool with human passengers, there is no doubt about that. But beyond that, what else was it carrying?

The Independent article refers to tons of South American silver.

But an eye-witness account of Floyd Gibbons, a passenger and journalist on board The Laconia, mentions "foodstuffs, cotton, and war material".

Gibbons reports on a brief conversation he had with a crew member shortly after the ship had been struck by a torpedo.

The jibbering, bullet-headed Negro was pulling directly behind me and I turned to quiet him as his frantic reaches with his oar were hitting me in the back. In the dull light from the upper decks I looked into his slanting face, eyes all whites and lips moving convulsively. Besides being frightened, the man was freezing in the thin cotton shirt that composed his entire upper covering. He would work feverishly to get warm.

"Get away from her; get away from her," he kept repeating. "When the water hits her hot boilers, she'll blow up, and there's just tons and tons of shrapnel in the hold!"

Gibbons states that just six American civilians were sailing on board The Laconia when it sunk, and that just two died. But still the sinking of The Laconia was reported right across America and caused great outrage.

So again, as with The Lusitania, a human shield was placed before war material bound for England. And if the Germans should sink the ship? Well reports of the sinking could be placed in American media to drive America into a frenzy. And Gibbons' account was read aloud in Congress. A few months later America eventually joined the war, to the great relief of Great Britain.


From http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/battle-for-the-treasure-chest-that-changed-the-course-of-the-great-war-1646524.html

Battle for the treasure chest that changed the course of the Great War

The wreck of a liner torpedoed in 1917 has been discovered. But who owns its £3m cargo, asks Cahal Milmo

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

Britain is locked in a court battle with an American treasure-hunting company over ownership of the wreck of a cruise liner with its valuable cargo of bullion, torpedoed in the First World War by a German U-boat in the Atlantic. The 18,000-tonne Royal Mail Ship Laconia, which had been commandeered by the British government, was attacked with the loss of 13 passengers, including three Americans, en route from New York to Liverpool on 25 February 1917.

That changed the course of the war: a graphic account of the sinking by an American journalist aboard was credited with helping to push the United States into joining the conflict after it was read to both Houses of Congress.

But the discovery of the hull of the former Cunard liner 160 miles off Ireland by Odyssey Marine Exploration, a Florida-based company, has turned RMS Laconia into the source of a new transatlantic power struggle. The treasure-hunters have been appointed "custodian" of the wreck and its contents, including 852 bars of silver and 132 boxes of silver coins worth an estimated £3m.

Thursday, March 12, 2009


There are only three things guaranteed in life; death, taxes and government lies.

For instance, this media operation over the protest in Luton. It stinks. By law the Police have a duty to consider the impact of any protest, including violent reaction. They must also take into account what the protest itself is to say so it does not provoke violent reaction or is libelous etc. I wake up this morning to find on GMTV that 93% of respondents to a survey want to ban protests at military homecomings. I would not be surprised to find that a majority of those people still believe it is legal to protest outside Parliament. In the papers some interviewees or those who have written in make that suggestion; go protest outside Parliament, not at the soldiers.


A few years ago you could...but not now.

And now these very same people are wanting to ban protests at homecomings.

I'm beginning to think that the protest was allowed and given permission to say whatever they liked in order to provoke a violent reaction so that further such protests are banned, possibly other protests, because that is what the media was asking yesterday; do we have the right to free speech and protest?

Another reason is to take the heat off the bankers.

If we ban protest at military homecomings what does that mean? It means that we cannot show the soldiers that when they go to war based on government lies then we cannot tell them when they come home that they went to war based on government lies.

They cannot be accused as baby-killers and rapists unless there is indisputable evidence, and I do not believe that such evidence exists for The Poachers who paraded in Luton. So the protestors are wrong in that case. But the government/terrorist allegation is perfectly valid and can be verified without any trouble at all.

But what is not being asked is, what were we doing in Iraq in the first place?

Because our government told us lies...and they knew it!

Blair's got his blood money.

Brown will get his.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009


Much has been made in the media, last night and this morning, of the protest of the homecoming of "The Poachers" in Luton yesterday.

The Royal Anglian Regiment paraded through Luton. A group of local muslims protested. Last night the media were happy to report that violence occured, but did not mention who was arrested, implying the protestors were violent. One interviewer on BBC radio I heard last night allowed an interviewee to continue his claims that protestors had been arrested for violence. It was 5 minutes later that the interviewer clarified the point that it was not protestors who had been arrested.

But this morning I have yet to hear one mention of those arrests.

The protestors had appplied to protest (this in a land of freedom!?). Their application was accepted. Their protest was thus legal. Their protest was filmed. The police stood immediately in front of them and filmed them.

The Poachers had returned from Iraq.

Iraq. That land of sand and oil...and home of the largest US Embassy on the planet.

Nearly six years to the day that lying Bilderberg bastard Tony "grinning maniac" Blair stood up in Parliament and lied. He lied and lied, and just in case he hadn't lied enough, he lied some more. And sat behind him, not questioning one single claim that Blair made, was Gordon Brown. Blair told our elected representatives that CIA agent Saddam Hussein had WMD what could strike everyone's garden barbecue within 45 minutes. Blair told our elected representatives that Iraqi oil would be held in a UN trust fund and all proceeds from the use of Iraqi oil, extraction, processing and distribution, would go to Iraq, "Iraqi oil for the Iraqis". And just in case we weren't outraged into war there were also allegations that Iraq was involved in 9/11 complete with cartoons of Saddam flying a plane into a tower of the WTC.

But since then, what has happened?

Since 20th March 2003 an estimate of 1 million Iraqi civilian deaths has been reached. Most were killed by the Coalition of the Willing, from 30,000 feet in the sky, or from missiles fired from miles away, smart missiles that we were told could recognise the difference between a terrorist and a non-terrorist (civilian).

Since 20th March 2003 Iraqi oil has been quietly awarded to a handful of Anglo-American oil companies, owned and/or managed by Blair's Bilderberger friends.

Since 20th March 2003 it has been shown that Iraq did not have WMD and was not involved in 9/11.

And since 20th March 2003 Tony "grinning maniac" Blair has been awarded a consultancy post with J P Morgan Chase, arguably the most evil bank on the planet (though HSBC could have something to say about that), and has also been appointed Special Peace Envoy to the Middle East, which is such a demanding role that when Israel was laying waste to Gaza over New Year and killing thousands of Gazan civilians Blair could not leave his holiday to stop the carnage.

So putting yesterday's events in perspective;
1. why was a parade desired and/or required? have all and are all regiments returning from Iraq to make similar parades? If so why?
2. why is nothing now being said of the arrests? the protest was legal (and was being filmed by police). And why were earlier mentions of the arrests attempts to imply that the protestors had been violent?
3. why was there such a media presence for this parade but not for the return of the wounded maimed and indeed for the return of the caskets filled with the dead?
4. why is the real reason for the war not being mentioned : OIL/IMPERIALISM/MORE WAR? (see Rebuilding America's Defenses and A Clean Break)

I have no evidence that any soldier who paraded yesterday was a baby-killer, and I do not believe they are.

But our government is a using "our boys" as a massively financed and armed terrorist organisation, lying to us and in some cases allowing civilians to die in order to persuade us that "our boys" must be sent abroad on military adventures to provoke yet more war or to simply steal natural resources.

Meanwhile, when "our boys" return home injured their government treats them like shit, refuses them treatment and hides them away from the public!

Tuesday, March 10, 2009


Bankers as teachers in the classroom? What a good idea.

Now why didn't the FSA think of that to satisfy Section 4 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Public Awareness, which states

4 Public awareness

(1) The public awareness objective is: promoting public understanding of the financial system.

(2) It includes, in particular—

(a) promoting awareness of the benefits and risks associated with different kinds of investment or other financial dealing; and

(b) the provision of appropriate information and advice.

(3) “The financial system” has the same meaning as in section 3.

Why didn't the FSA order bankers into the classroom to tell the children and their mums and dads how The City of London was screwing them for every penny they could squeeze out of them?

This fasttracking of ex-bankers into the classroom although very controversial to the teaching profession will open up a new opportunity for teachers and parents to quiz bankers on their activities, their ethics and morals and practices, and those of their board members, and all in the congenial atmosphere of the staff room.

Monday, March 09, 2009


In September last year The Meteorological Office made a prediction about the weather for Winter 2008/9.

From http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2008/pr20080925.html

Trend of mild winters continues

25 September 2008

The Met Office forecast for the coming winter suggests it is, once again, likely to be milder than average. It is also likely that the coming winter will be drier than last year.

Seasonal forecasts from the Met Office are used by many agencies across government, private and third sectors to help their long-term planning.


NB remember the shortage of salt stocks? Some local authorities were using table salt!

But on February 25th The Meteorological Office reported that the Winter 2008/9 was the coldest for ten years and we had the heaviest snowfall for 18 years.

From http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20090225.html

Coldest winter for a decade

25 February 2009

Mild weather is expected to see out what remains of winter. Despite this, it is expected to be the coldest UK winter since 1995/96, according to provisional Met Office figures.

The low temperatures have also been accompanied at times by heavy snow. During early February, the heaviest snowfall for 18 years was experienced over many areas of the UK.

This brings into question the predictions of man-made global warming. Prince Charles indulged in a little scaremongering over the weekend by stating that we had less than 100 months to save the planet. But can we trust the Meteorological Office predictions eight years in advance when it cannot predict the weather over one winter?

And as for air traffic and airport expansion? Air transport is by far the most polluting activity of mankind. If the government were so green then why is it wanting to expand air transport? This is such an anti-green action. But it does want to be greener than thou when surveillance and monitoring of our activities can be achieved, e.g. fixing microchips into cars to tax-by-mile.

Just thinking out loud. That's all.

I am allowed to think, am I not? It is not against the law, not yet anyway.

I won't get extradited to Germany or Morocco for thinking, will I, not yet anyway?

Saturday, March 07, 2009


So database that!

It is not illegal to protest.

It is not illegal to protest against war.

It's a rapidly disappearing freedom that our fathers and grandfathers fought in the engineered world wars for, isn't it?

There are bankers walking away with undeserved multi-million pound pay-offs after saddling us with decades of yet more debt to bail out bankrupt gambling banks with well over a trillion pounds, and what does Old Bill do? It films people legally protesting against illegal and fraudulent wars.

I shake my head in disbelief and shame.

Get some of those bankers banged up under The Fraud Act 2006 Section 4 Fraud By Abuse of position.

Friday, March 06, 2009


And when God looked upon London, he wept.

He wept with all his heart and soul, until he could weep no more. For London had become a cesspit of manipulation, mass murder, greed and fraud.

He could see it all before him. The engineered world wars. The mass genocide. The imposed starvation. The centralisation of power to a growing world government.

And he wept.

But what good that did us, eh?


Today, like every day, is Don't Think Day.

Don't think about how the Bank of England is creating £75 billion.

Don't even think about why the Bank of England is creating £75 billion after all the money the banks have had so far.

And don't even think why all these global organizations are being established and empowered, or how they are financed.

Yes, today, like every day, is Don't Think Day.

Thursday, March 05, 2009


Craig Murray has applied to give evidence to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights. For some reason they have not yet decided on whether or not to hear him, but will do so on the 10th March. He is asking bloggers to blog, and writers to write to jchr@parliament.uk to let them know that as servants of the public you want them to hear Craig's evidence.

But if they refuse I suppose Craig could go down there anyway with a megaphone ad bust the place wide open...


From http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/

March 4, 2009
Your Help Needed - Reveal Torture to Stop It

On Tuesday 10 March the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights will discuss whether or not to hear my evidence on the UK government's policy of using intelligence from torture. They discussed whether to hear my evidence on 3 March but failed to reach a conclusion.

The government is lobbying hard for my exclusion. I need everybody to send an email to jchr@parliament.uk to urge that I should be allowed to give evidence. Just a one-liner would be fine. If you are able to add some comment on the import of my evidence, or indicate that you have heard me speak or read my work, that may help. Please copy your email to craigjmurray@tiscali.co.uk.

Please also pass on this plea to anyone you can and urge them to act. Help from other bloggers in posting this appeal would be much appreciated.

The evidence I am trying to give the parliamentary committee is this:

I wish to offer myself as a witness before the Joint Commission on Human Rights on the subject of the UK government's policy on intelligence cooperation with torture abroad.

I appeared as a witness in person before both the European Parliament and European Council's enquiries into extraordinary rendition. My evidence was described by the European Council's Rapporteur, Senator Dick Marty, as "Compelling and valuable".

The key points I wish to make are these:

- I was British Ambassador in Uzbekistan from 2002 to 2004.
- I learned and confirmed that I was regularly seeing intelligence from detainees in the Uzbek torture chambers, sent me by the CIA via MI6.
- British Ministers and officials were seeing the same torture material.
- In October/November 2002 and January/Februray 2003 I sent two Top Secret telegrams to London specifically on the subject of our receipt of intelligence gained under torture. I argued this was illegal, immoral and impractical. The telegrams were speciifically marked for the Secretary of State.
- I was formally summoned back to the FCO for a meeting held on 7 or 8 March 2003 specifically and solely on the subject of intelligence gained under torture. Present were Linda Duffield, Director Wider Europe, FCO, Sir Michael Wood, Chief Legal Adviser, FCO, and Matthew Kydd, Head of Permanent Under-Secretary's Department, FCO.
- This meeting was minuted. I have seen the record, which is classified Top Secret and was sent to Jack Straw. On the top copy are extensive hand-written marginalia giving Jack Straw's views.
- I was told at this meeting that it is not illegal for us to obtain intelligence gained by torture, provided that we did not do the torture ourselves. I was told that it had been decided that as a matter of War on Terror policy we should now obtain intelligence from torture, following discussion between Jack Straw and Richard Dearlove. I was told that we could not exclude receipt of specific material from the CIA without driving a coach and horses through the universality principle of the UK/US intelligence sharing agreement, which would be detrimental to UK interests.
- Sir Michael Wood's legal advice that it was not illegal to receive intelligence got by torture was sent on to me in Tashkent (copy attached).
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/documents/Wood.pdf- On 22 July 2004

I sent one further telegram on intelligence got by torture, with a lower classification, following FCO communications on the subject. Copy attached.
It was my final communication before being dismissed as Ambassador.

In conclusion, I can testify that beyond any doubt the British government has for at least six years a considered but secret policy of cooperation with torture abroad. This policy legally cleared by government legal advisers and approved by Jack Straw as Secretary of State.

Craig Murray
2 March 2009

Monday, March 02, 2009


Jack Straw's decision to not disclose the details of any argument held by Cabinet before the invasion of Iraq 2003 (even though there was no discussion!)?
Booo. Hisss. Get off.

Sir, repeat Sir, Fred Goodwin's decision to take his pension (even though the government agreed it!)?
Booo. Hisss. Get off.

Tony Blair's decision to at long last visit Gaza for the first time since his appointment as Special Peace Envoy even though it was being obliterated at New Year and Blair couldn't drag himself away from his well-deserved New Year holiday?
Booo. Hisss. Get off.

These and many more are all linked in one (not so) covert effort to
1. screw us all as much as possible
2. create conditions for world war

Surely there is a crime being committed? Surely it can't be lawful to engineer a world war between deliberately impoverished peoples?