Sunday, March 14, 2010

UK GOVERNMENT CLIMATE CHANGE ADS ARE BANNED

The Advertising Standards Authority has banned two of the terrorising ads produced with taxpayer money designed to scare us all shitless about the bogus theory of manmade global warming. The ads have been banned because the science behind the ads is unproven. A short film based on the same load of bollocks has been referred to Ofcom.

These crooks should be done for terror and fraud, and also mass murder because the ultimate aim of these ads is to implement green Nazi policies of mass genocide because the ptb believe there are too many of us on the planet; but they don't want to kill themselves, they want to kill you instead, so they come up with this load of bollocks.

The mysterious Georgia Guidestones state a maximum of 500 million people.

The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment 1996 states a maximum of 1 billion people.

============================================

From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7061162.ece

Ed Miliband's adverts banned for overstating climate change
Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor

The Advertising Standards Asociation has banned Ed Miliband's Environment department from running misleading nursery rhyme advertisements on climate change.

The adverts' claims 'were not supported by science'

TWO government advertisements that use nursery rhymes to warn people of the dangers of climate change have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for exaggerating the potential harm.

The adverts, commissioned by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, used the rhymes to suggest that Britain faces an inevitable increase in storms, floods and heat waves unless greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control.

The ASA has ruled that the claims made in the newspaper adverts were not supported by solid science and has told the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that they should not be published again.

It has also referred a television commercial to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom, for potentially breaching a prohibition on political advertising.

No comments: