Thursday, October 30, 2014


The NATO media is reporting that NATO intercepted Russian warplanes flying over Europe with the implication that Russia was going to bomb us to death but the White Knights of NATO came to our rescue. Their wording is usually loaded with menace. But surprisingly it is The Guardian that is reporting this story with the least hysteria.

The spokesman said there was no particular reason for concern over Russian warplanes exercising their right to fly in international air space but that such sorties were shadowed by Nato aircraft as a precaution and to protect civil air traffic.

[source : Nato jets intercept Russian warplanes following 'unusual level of air activity', The Guardian,, 30th October 2014]

So Russia had not invaded NATO airspace, as implied by the reports, but was instead flying in international airspace but a little further South than usual, and NATO did not intercept but merely shadowed the planes.

Phew!! World War 3 averted by NATO, who support neo-Nazis in Ukraine and international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria.

So what provoked this media hysteria?


JFK is the best film I have seen. But in my top 5 is Saving Private Ryan. I was completely blown away by the opening 20 minutes or so. I can well imagine that landing on the beaches of Normandy was exactly like that: terror; horror; blood; limbs; noise; fire; screams; death.

That is what our fathers and grandfathers went through.

To remember what our ancestors went through I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June this year to protest the engineering of World War One by the British monarchy through Freemasonry. Nobody but me turned up. The purpose of WW1 was to create a world government, The League of Nations, which was proposed by Sir Edward Grey in 1915. The USA voted to stay out of the LoN. This decision led to the British monarchy through Anglophile Wall Street engineering World War 2.

Our fathers and grandfathers went through hell for us, to make this world a better place.

But is it?

A war has been boiling in Syria. We are told that honourable 'freedom fighters' are fighting a despotic Syrian President Assad. But the truth is that nations like Qatar and headchopping Saudi Arabia have been financing international cutthroat Jihadis to kick out Assad so that a pipeline from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey onto Europe can be built to threaten Russia's supply of gas, while Assad wants a pipeline from Iran through Iraq and Syria to Europe that protects Russia's supplies to Europe. NATO has been supporting the international cutthroat Jihadis through providing arms, training, political, logistical and moral support, and so-called 'non-lethal' equipment. The 'revolution' by NATO-sponsored neo-Nazis in Ukraine is part of this war to destroy Russia.

Yesterday Callous Cameron met with the Emir of Qatar. He apparently pleaded for Qatar to invest in Great Britain.

So why is Callous Cameron, who allowed David Haines and Alan Henning to have their heads sawn off to provide a casus belli for him and his bloodthirsty gimps in The Marsten House to overtly meddle in Syria, prostituting himself to Qatar?

Let's get this straight: Qatar is already one of the richest countries in the world and wants to become even richer by financing international cutthroat Jihadis to slit the throats of defenceless Syrian children as they try in vain to kick out President Assad in order to build a pipeline from his country to transport gas from the Pars field to Europe; and Callous Cameron wants the Emir of Qatar to invest their bloodmoney in Great Britain?

Did our fathers and grandfathers die on the beaches of Normandy for this?

(Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron on Wednesday urged Qatar to plough more of its vast oil and gas wealth into infrastructure projects across Britain during an official visit from the Gulf state's emir.

Cameron asked Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani to consider further funding to help Britain's push to develop cities in the north of the country and connect them to London using a high speed rail line, a statement released by his office said.

Qatar is one of the world's richest countries and is already heavily invested in British firms and property.

[source : PM Cameron appeals to Qatar emir for more investment, Reuters,, 29th October 2014]

Note that both Cameron and the Emir both have their heads on their shoulders, as do the former IS hostages whose ransoms were paid for their release despite a G8 agreement that ransoms should not be paid. Sadly, David Haines and Alan Henning were allowed by Cameron and the Emir to have their heads sawn off to provide a casus belli for Great Britain to overtly meddle in Syria so that the very wealthy Emir can become even wealthier and invest his bloodmoney in Great Britain.

This is Great Britain today, just less than two weeks before Remembrance Day.

C'est magnifique, innit?

Wednesday, October 29, 2014


In addition to proclaiming that the British monarchy engineered World War One, another way that Stop The War could stop the war is to tell the truth about 9/11.

Lindsey German was on Sky the other day talking about Afghanistan. Here she is.

The war in Afghanistan was about opium. The Taliban had virtually eradicated the opium crop. But within a few years of NATO going to hunt bin Laden the opium harvests were at record levels. Indeed, it was announced just the other day that the opium harvest in Afghanistan had reached a new record high. But in order to get NATO initially into Afghanistan and then keep them there an excuse was needed.

Cue 9/11.

Osama bin Laden denied organising 9/11. But then in December a video of him was 'found'. And it is so comical. Bin Laden suffered from Marfan Syndrome. He was frail, tall and thin. Yet in the video of 13th December 2001 he is rosy-cheeked and fat! In reality, it is around this time that he eventually succumbed to Marfan Syndrome and died. He required frequent kidney dialysis. How could he drag a kidney dialysis behind him around the remote Afghan mountains for years? He didn't. He died around New Year 2002.

So if Bin Laden died around New Year 2002, who was allegedly killed on 1st May 2011 in Abbottobad? Did anyone die? A video was 'found' showing 'bin Laden' watching TV. But that video was taken from behind and from his left hand side. thus not providing a clear look at his face. There is serious doubt the official story about what went on that night. The story changed from hour to hour. Staged photos were released suggesting that the White House watched ObL get popped live from a camera on one of the alleged assassins helmets. And why was ObL's corpse allegedly buried so bloody quickly at sea??!


Yet in her appearance on Sky the other day German played the consumate gatekeeper and stated that:
1. Osama bin Laden attacked the twin towers on 9/11;
2. he had survived years of a manhunt and was assassinated a few years ago.

I read German's bio on wikipedia. She has been closely associated with the pro-abortion movement. You know what abortion is, don't you? Killing babies. They may not have been born but they are still babies. I ask, why is it OK for men and women to shag around and then kill defenceless babies yet not OK for NATO to bomb Afghan babies?

In my eyes it is not OK for either.

The pro-abortion movement is part of the degenerate agenda stated by Dr Richard Day. "Anything goes", he said. Anything Goes.

I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June earlier this year. I called for that protest to recognise the engineering of World War One by the British monarchy and their Freemasonic networks, and to pay respect to ALL, not just British but, casualties form all nations, who suffered and/or died in that terrible, horrific unnecessary war. On the day just me turned up. But just on the other side of Covent Garden there was a massive parade and celebration of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.


We have to ask, why is Stop The War:
1. so reluctant to recognise the blatantly obvious engineering of World War One by the British monarchy;
2. gatekeeping for the warmongers by propagating the myth that Osama bin Laden did 9/11 when he never admitted it, and that he survived a manhunt by the world, somehow dragging a kidney dialysis machine behind him as he hid in the remote Afghan mouontains, to be eventually killed in May 2011 when he actually died from Marfan Syndrome in December 2001;
3. allowing itself to be run by a pro-abortionist who is waging war on unborn children and promoting the degenerate agenda.


Yesterday I commented on the symbolic ceramic red poppies surrounding The Tower of London, suggesting that the flood of red blood pouring out of the walls of the tower could be seen as showing that World War One was due to the British monarchy. We associate the red poppy with WW1 and the British Monarchy used to kill their enemies in The Tower of London. Thus, through this ceramic red poppy field the British monarchy symbolically created each red poppy, representing each dead British soldier, through Grand Master King Edward VII engineering the Triple Entente, the British monarchy's Freemasonic network assassinating Arch Duke Ferdinand, and King George V telling Germany that Great Britain would not embroil itself in any subsequent war but then ordering Sir Edward Grey to get us into the war, which Grey did by citing the obscure 1839 Treaty of London concerning the neutrality of Belgium. This is a very brief sketch of the British monarchy engineered World War One. WW1 was called The War To End All Wars. It was supposed to do that by creating a world government, which was proposed by the aforementioned Sir Edward Grey in 1915 to his co-conspirator Colonel House. But despite the endeavours of the British and their agents in the USA, America voted to stay out of The League of Nations. This decision led to WW2.

Anyway, Stop The War has refused to recognise this blatantly obvious, in-your-face evidence that the British monarchy engineered WW1 to establish a world government and continues to push other theories. Their semi-official booklet pushes the it-was-going-to-happen-anyway theory. Today they push yet another theory; nationalism.

Stop The War have posted a comment in, yes you've guessed it, The Guardian, by Jonathan Jones who writes an art blog. Jones writes:
It is deeply disturbing that a hundred years on from 1914, we can only mark this terrible war as a national tragedy. Nationalism – the 19th-century invention of nations as an ideal, as romantic unions of blood and patriotism – caused the great war.

No. Nationalism did NOT cause WW1. The British monarchy did. The other nations were cooperating and developing, and implementing The American System of Economics, which led to Germany and the USA replacing the Brutish Empire, based on brutal slavery, as the dominant economic forces in the world.

Still, Jones' article is good for its anti-war sentiment, but in a way this nationalism of the British people that Jones complains about is good because it shows that we do still care about what our ancestors went through, so if we could be told the real truth about how and why all that unnecessary slaughter was engineered then the British people would be absolutely furious.

But sadly, Stop The War oontinues to protect the true culprits by pushing every theory about WW1, that bore people to death because they've heard them all before, except the truth, which is that WW1 was a conspiracy engineered in Buckingham Palace and Freemasons Hall.


What will Callous Cameron and the Emir of Qatar-rorism really be discussing today?

The Guardian has yet again shown its establishment credentials in publishing a comment by the Prime Minister of Qatar-rorism in which the Prime Minister of Qatar-rorism promotes Qatar as a utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, battling the very Qatar-rorism that it and the headchopping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have financed in Syria for the last four years!!

Entitled Qatar and the UK stand together in the fight against terrorism, the comment is the biggest, sweatiest, hairiest load of bollocks you will read this week. And the comments from readers recognise its bollocksicity (the very high bollocks factor).

The war in Syria is all about getting natural gas from the Pars field from Qatar to Europe via Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey to challenge Russia's influence in Europe. But Assad wants a pipeline from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to Europe but also protecting Russia's client base.

That is what the war in Syria is all about, and to get the Qatari proposal built Callous Cameron has been supporting the use of international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria to oust Assad in a false Jihad, and MI5 have been allowing preachers such as Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad on the streets of London to fuel that fake Jihad against Assad.

And the usually pro-establishment warmongering Con Coughlin is apparently raising an eyebrow at this meeting today, asking, Whose side is Qatar really on in the war against Islamic State?


Why did Steven Soderbergh direct the 2011 film Contagion?

This may at first sound like a silly question...until you watch the 2000 film he directed entitled Traffic that pushed for drug legalisation, won four oscars, but in several scenes also showed boxes with 9/11 stamped on them.


How can we find out what Liz knew about the current drop in oil prices, when she knew it, and what did she do as a result of that knowledge?

Extension: Did Liz order the current drop in oil prices?

Tuesday, October 28, 2014


The curious Lizzie Phelan has tweeted that perhaps Saudi Arabia is reducing oil prices to curb US production.


These two are supporting international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria to get a pipeline built from Qatar through KSA, Jordan, Syria and Turkey to sell to the EU and destroy the EU's dependency on Russia!

The purpose in reducing global oil prices is to minimise Russia's global influence.


Under what circumstances could and/or should you, no matter what profession you are in or whether you are a parent or not, never ask any questions about anything, and instead just blindly accept what you are told by a lying mainstream media, to live out your dreams of greed, vanity and lust?

Coz I can't think of any!

Particularly if you are a teacher...


Under what circumstances could and/or should you never ask questions about World War One, particularly if you think you are special and you are being told the truth about World War One?

Coz I can't think of any!


Look at this photo in The Daily Mail of the ceramic red poppy field surrounding The Tower of London.

It looks like the poppies, symbolising blood, are pouring out of The Tower of London.

We associate the red poppy with World War One.

I have been trying to convince you all that World War One was engineered by the British monarchy through Freemasonry.

Maybe this photo will help, symbolically, because the British monarchy used to execute and even behead people in The Tower of London.

That's what they did in World War One.

And that's what they are doing now in Syria through their support, if not ordering, of Saudi Arabia to unleash international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria, who have evolved (with some help) into The Islamic State, who were allowed by Callous Cameron to saw off the heads of David Haines and Alan Henning to provide the casus belli for this Disunited Fascist Queendom to eventually overtly meddle in Syria, kick out Assad and get that pipeline from Qatar to Europe via Turkey to reduce Russia's global influence.

One of those poppies could be for an unwitting Private from a small village in Gloucestershire, blown to bits or mowed down by a German machine gun.

The Send-off by Wilfred Owen

Down the close, darkening lanes they sang their way
To the siding-shed,
And lined the train with faces grimly gay.

Their breasts were stuck all white with wreath and spray
As men's are, dead.

Dull porters watched them, and a casual tramp
Stood staring hard,
Sorry to miss them from the upland camp.
Then, unmoved, signals nodded, and a lamp
Winked to the guard.

So secretly, like wrongs hushed-up, they went.
They were not ours:
We never heard to which front these were sent.

Nor there if they yet mock what women meant
Who gave them flowers.

Shall they return to beatings of great bells
In wild trainloads?
A few, a few, too few for drums and yells,
May creep back, silent, to still village wells
Up half-known roads.

Blame it all on King Edward VII, King George V and Sir Edward Grey.


9/11 was an inside job (no matter what Russell Brand says).

9/11 was designed to start wars in North Africa and the Middle East, in particular on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon (all named in Israel's 1996 call for war entitled A Clean Break) together with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. According to General Wesley Clark, all of these seven nations should have experienced war and regime change by 2007, because the plan was leaked to him.

We went into Afghanistan to restore record opium harvests, not to get Osama bin Laden who died around New Year 2002 from Marfan Syndrome.

After Afghanistan, Iraq in 2003, supposedly for WMDs and 9/11, but these were lies.

After Iraq came Israel's war on Lebanon.

So by 2007 only Iraq and Lebanon had experienced war, and Hezbollah was even stronger after the war.

To continue this series of wars a fresh approach was required. The population of NATO countries was sick and tired of war because of 9/11. So the plan was amended to use useful idiots, the international cutthroat Jihadis we see in Syria today. They would be unleashed onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. This was reported by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection. These international cutthroat Jihadis would either take out the leaders or create a humanitarian catastrophe that the international community could not ignore. But in order to be given support from NATO they had to be portrayed as 'freedom fighters'. So the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring.

The international cutthroat Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya. BSF advised and guided them on the ground, while NATO became their air force. Gaddafi, who was giving MI6 and CIA the names of al Qaeda in Libya found that those he had named were then being supported by MI6 and the CIA to take him out, which they eventually did, as per the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.

After Libya the international cutthroat Jihadis were transported to Turkey and Lebanon and smuggled into Syria. Great Britain had asked former French foreign minister Roland Dumas to create these pipelines to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. And from then on the international cutthroat Jihadis have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children, eating the hearts of their prisoners, and using chemical weapons in desperate attempts to fool NATO into intervening on their behalf against Assad.

The war in Syria is not about freedom and democracy but about transporting natural gas from the Pars field across Syria. Qatar supported by Saudi Arabia and NATO member Turkey wants to transport that gas through their nations via Jordan and Syria and onwards to the EU to cut off Russian supplies to the EU. This is supported by NATO, who are also backing neo Nazis in Ukraine to control Russian gas supplies through Ukraine. But Iran, Iraq and Syria want a pipeline through their nations and onto the EU but protecting Russian supplies to the EU. This is obviously supported by Russia.

So who should you, as a human being and not an erotic animal, support?

In one corner, on 9/11 NATO and its allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel flew planes in to the WTC and The Pentagon and then initiated this plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five year that was revealed to General Wesley Clark. When that plan became moribund they decided to unleash the useful idiots, the cannibals, the international cutthroat Jihadis, who have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children and using chemical weapons to fool us into supporting their cutthroat Jihad. We have been doing our bit by allowing preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad on the streets of London to provide fresh meat for the Jihadi factory to transport to Syria in one of the Jihadi pipelines into Syria that are run by NATO member Turkey (and we saw what Adebalajo eventually did). They have also backed neo Nazis in a violent coup in Ukraine.

In the other corner, Russia has not flown planes into its own buildings to start a series of wars, has not invaded countries or bombed countries into the stone age based on blatant lies and killing a million in the process, is opposing the international cutthroat Jihadis of NATO in Syria (for reasons explained above), and has recently created a development bank as a rival to the Federal Reserve System that has sucked the life out of the human race through the IMF. Russia opposed the NATO-sponsored neo Nazis in Ukraine.

This is the choice that you have to make now. Today. Not tomorrow. Not next month or after Crimbo.



Under what circumstances would and/or should you ostracise someone telling you the truth?

Coz I can't think of any!

Monday, October 27, 2014


The RCMP claims to have found video showing Michael Zehaf Bibaeu had ideological and political motives.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police commissioner Bob Paulson said in a statement they had “persuasive evidence” that Michael Zehaf-Bibeau’s attack, in which he shot and killed a soldier at the national war memorial before being gunned down himself, was “driven by ideological and political motives”.

[source : Canadian parliament attacker made video of himself, police say, The Guardian,, 27th October 2014]

But can we trust Paulson?

He said that Zehaf Bibeau wanted to go to Syria. Have we any evidence of this? Zehaf Bibeau's mum told the RCMP that he wanted to go to Saudi Arabia.


One of the better investigative reporters, F William Engdahl, has put more flesh on the bones of what I believe is happening over Syria.

The details are emerging of a new secret and quite stupid Saudi-US deal on Syria and the so-called IS. It involves oil and gas control of the entire region and the weakening of Russia and Iran by Saudi Arabian flooding the world market with cheap oil. Details were concluded in the September meeting by US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Saudi King. The unintended consequence will be to push Russia even faster to turn east to China and Eurasia.

[source : The Secret Stupid Saudi-US Deal on Syria, Boiling Frogs,, 24th October 2014]

The article sets out the argument that the war in Syria is to kick out Assad to allow Qatar and Saudi Arabia to transport gas from Pars to Turkey and onto the EU to cut off Russian supplies to the EU, which would please NATO very, very much, which is the reason why NATO has been supporting Saudi Arabia's international cutthroat Jihadis.

Engdahl also proposes that this war on Russia has another front with Saudi Arabia decreasing global oil prices. Petrol pioces have been falling in the UK, but could and should they be falling further and faster?

No doubt Saudi Arabia either told Liz or was told by Liz that this was going to happen. So are petrol prices artificially high?

So, the huge question is: Should Liz be referred to the Competition and Markets Authority?

Sunday, October 26, 2014


The adulterous mother of Michael Zehaf Bibeau, Susan Zehaf Bibeau, has written to Post Media News. The letter is available to read at .

And in that letter she states that she explicitly told the RCMP that her son wanted to go to Saudi Arabia to study Islam. Not to Syria, or Libya as I had read. But Saudi Arabia. Yet nowhere in any reports that I have read has this desire to go to Saudi Arabia been raised.

Why is that? Because any link from Zehaf Bibeau to Saudi Arabia would provoke investigation into Saudi terrorism, and possible war on Saudi Arabia.

Here is what Susan Zehaf Bibeau has written regarding Saudi Arabia.
What did he talk about at our final lunch, he talked about religion, how it was good. How I was wrong to pursue the materiality of this world. He had come to Ottawa to try and get his passport. He ultimately wanted to go to Saudi Arabia and study Islam, study the Coran. He thought he would be happier in an islamic country where they would share his beliefs. He mentioned that he had applied more than one month ago and thought the difficulty in getting it was the name of the reference he had given. So he had come to Ottawa to try and convince them to give him one. He said that the «shaytan» was testing him. This was not new, he often spoke of the devil and his attempts to entice people to him. I want to correct the statement of the RCMP I never said he wanted to go to Syria, I specifically said Saudi Arabia. They taped my conversation so there can little doubt about the accuracy of what I said. I did phone the agent to point the error, I don’t know it they corrected it.

But here is a report from CTV News that states that Susan told investigators that Michael wanted to go to Syria.
When Zehaf-Bibeau initially applied for a passport, it seemed that he had wanted to travel to Libya, Paulson said. But his mother told investigators Wednesday that her son wanted to go to Syria.

[source : Ottawa shooting suspect Michael Zehaf-Bibeau had 'very developed criminality', CTV News,, 23rd October 2014]

So why are the Canadian media hiding this desire of Zehaf Bibeau to travel to headchopping terrorist-funding Saudi Arabia?

And what else are they hiding?

What is becoming clear is that:
1. Michael Zehaf Bibeau was addicted to drugs, knew this, tried to seek help but was denied, and even threatened committing serious crime to get thrown in to prison to receive treatment;
2. he believed that going to abroad to study Islam would help him get off drugs, but for this he needed a passport;
3. the passport was being denied possibly because of a reference - but has the reason been provided to the media yet?;
4. he was often seen with 2 men discussing Islam, but they have now disappeared;
5. despite being banned for life from owning a gun he was able to obtain one, implying he obtained it illegally through criminals, or was given it.

And he was not going to Syria, and he was not on a terrorist watch list, as was first stated.


In 1969 high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day revealed the agenda to a private audience. One item of the agenda was that regarding sex it would be "anything goes". Homosexuality is part of this agenda, and if you go back into how homosexuality has become more acceptable it began around 1970, i.e. one year after Day's speech. The media quickly went from anti-homosexual to pro-homosexual. That's how society is controlled, by mass media. It is the media who lies us into war. It is the media that covers up establishment paedophilia. And it is the media that promotes homosexuality. Homosexuality also promotes depopulation.

Another result of sexual liberation is unwanted children, who are either murdered through abortion or dumped into an abusive system that produces outrages such as occured at Rotherham.

Last week Lady Gaga appeared on Strictly Come Dancing to sing Anything Goes with Tony Bennett. I commented that this was a joke on us. Lady Gaga, along with a handful of female musicians like Rihanna, are Illuminati agents whose purpose is to drag young girls in to this degenerate agenda.

Well, guess what Lady Gaga did recently during one of her concerts?
Lady Gaga recently sparked another controversy when she performed a sex act on an "inflatable" octopus at London's O2 Arena.

The 'Poker Face' hitmaker sucked on "inflatable" octopus' tentacles in front of hundreds of young fans, the Daily Star reported.

The 28-year-old singer further outraged parents with a PVC-clad lesbian sex show during which the singer screamed dozens of swear words.

One of the fans who came with her daughter said that she had always liked Gaga because she taught people to be themselves and accept others for who they were but this was far too much sex and swearing.

Gaga used the "F***" word 21 times between songs, and repeatedly called the 20,000-strong audience "mother f***ers."

[source : Lady Gaga's sex act with 'inflatable' octopus infuriates fans, Times of AP,, 26th October 2014]

Meanwhile, nice teachers in nice schools in nice English towns are forcing their nice students to write and create pro-war propaganda to encourage fighting in Freemason-engineered World War One to be stuck up on to their nice school's walls!

Saturday, October 25, 2014


In the cover up of the assassination of JFK someone may have got their times wrong and released Lee Harvey Oswald's bio etc a bit too early. This was noticed by Colonel Fletcher Prouty on his way back from a very curious mission at The South Pole, who found that he was reading Oswald's detailed bio in a New Zealand newspaper even before Oswald had been charged.

And so it is for Zehaf Bibeau.

It appears that the usual 'US officials' told AP and CBS that they knew all about Zehaf Bibeau, while Canada didn't have a clue about who the shooter was.
While Canadian news personalities were at police gunpoint, American outlets like CBS News and the Associated Press had a full story to sell, complete with the dead shooter’s name.

Before the scene was secure at 10:54am EDT, a joint release was published to identify the culprit. It stated,

“The gunmen has been identified by U.S. officials to CBS News as Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, a Canadian national born in 1982.”

By 4:58pm EDT, the story was edited to remove the shooter’s name, or any mention of the U.S. government’s knowledge.

...The story was altered again in the evening, when the Canadian government allowed the name of a shooter to be released and American media added law enforcement to their list of official sources. They also added a middle name, Abdul, to emphasize the suspect’s Islamic ties with an accusation of terrorism.

...If the U.S government could assess a terrorist attack on Canadian soil before the Canadian government was aware, then why was it not prevented?

[source : Government Passes Anti-Constitutional Surveillance Law During Ottawa Shooting, Free The Press Canada,, 23rd October 2014]



I just read this about what the Canadian Government was planning to do and it all came together:
The government had been set on Wednesday to unveil controversial amendments to Canada’s 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act that would give the security agencies new powers, including the integration of their surveillance of Canadians still more closely with the US National Security Agency (NSA) and other foreign intelligence services. Now, hoping to exploit the climate of fear and nationalism it has stoked up over this week’s attacks, the government has signaled it will postpone the amendments’ introduction so it can rewrite them to give the security forces still greater powers. The revised amendments will reportedly include enhanced powers to preventatively arrest terrorist suspects—that is, to detain people without charge on the mere suspicion that they may commit an illegal act in the future.

While the Conservatives have made no fresh announcements about Canada’s role in the new Mideast war, Canada’s military and corporate media have been urging the government to “level” with Canadians and announce that Canada’s combat mission will last longer than the current six months. They have also been clamouring for the government to match its bellicose rhetoric against Russia, Iran and other states with a huge increase in military spending.

[source : The Ottawa Shooting, WSWS,, 25th October 2014]

Just a teeny weeny bit more than a coincidence, don't you think?

Just as the Canadian Government is about to introduce controversial legislation on surveillance Canada suffers its first terrorist attacks.

And there is a whiff of Lee Harvey Oswald about Zehaf-Bibeau. That photograph of allegedly him with a scarf and brandishing a gun reminds me of the photo on the front page of Time with what was allegedly Oswald with a rifle.

And to add to this, the initial story put out about Zehaf-Bibeau was complete bollocks, and his discussions with two English-speaking men about Islam are nowhere to be found in the media, just like they are in real life. Just like JFKs brain!

Zehaf-Bibeau went to Ottawa to get a passport to go to the Middle East to study Islam and get off drugs. He had a long criminal record, some offences for drugs. He had been begging for help from the Canadian Government to get off drugs but was not given it. But within days of arriving in Ottawa he befriends two strange men, discusses Islam with them, they have since disappeared, and despite being banned for life from owning a gun he obtains one, shoots dead a Canadian soldier and then runs into the Canadian Parliament to be shot dead himself.

And all this just as nice, peaceful Canada was about to introduce draconian surveillance measures?

And what is the Canadian Governments response?

Scrap those proposed draconian laws and introduce even more draconian police state laws!!

What occured in Canada was a false flag, on the scale of The Reichstag Fire.

Friday, October 24, 2014


Was William Hague's surprise resignation as Foreign Secretary made because he knew or suspected what was being done regarding David Haines and Alan Henning?

Hague was Foreign Secretary when Moazzam Begg made his sensible and achievable proposals to negotiate the release of Haines and Henning, proposals which were outrageously rejected by someone in the FCO.

But who?

And why?

And when?


This tweet has appeared on Stop The War twitter.

The book promoted by STW as their official history of WW1 written by Neil Faulkner promotes the idea that it was going to happen no matter what.

So if that was the case then why did Freemasonry under orders from the British Monarchy arrange to have Arch Duke Ferdinand assassinated as a provocation?

Why did Great Britain create The Balkan Committee?

Their was a purpose in WW1. That was to create a world government under their control. The man who played a blinder in getting Europe to war, Sir Edward Grey, proposed The League of Nations as early as 1915 to his co-conspirator Colonel House. Grey's idea was taken up by Lord Robert Cecil in 1916 who entrusted the formation and administration of the world government to Eric Drummond, an insider if ever there was one.

But there was one huge problem: the USA voted to stay out of it!

So Anglophile Wall Street financed Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, and financed semi-secret organisations like The Council on Foreign Relations to persuade American politicians that the USA should support and join a world government.

After nearly six years of more horrific war than was experienced in WW1 the USA was persuaded to not only accept but to also host The United Nations, and a cabal of other world government institutions, such as the IMF and World Bank. Continental governments were also created as a stepping stone to a one world government.
We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.

[James Paul Warburg, 17th February 1950]

Warburg was the son of Paul Warburg, the architect of the Federal Reserve. The Warburgs, Rothschilds and Schiffs were all powers behind the Federal Reserve at the time and were all Hofjuden of the British Monarchy, sending their sons to each other's banks for training.

This is not a Jewish conspiracy. It is the British Monarchy behind all this sacrificing to Satan through world war.

But for whatever reason the Stop The War Marxists refuse to acknowledge this obvious conspiracy, instead deciding to protect the British Monarchy by saying it was all going to happen anyway.






The comedian-who-looks-like-Jesus Russell Brand was on Newsnight last night. The show is available on BBC but only for a few days. Brand's slot starts at 28:30 into the show.

Give Brand a few years and he is going to be a force in British politics. I'm not sure how major, but he will have some clout. He is connecting with grass roots campaigns, sympathising with them and promoting them. But he is also aware of the greater evil that currently runs the planet (but not for much longer). And being an alleged comedian Brand can use his alleged comedy, confidence and communication skills to promote those grass roots campaigns much better than most. Charisma is the word.

And because of this he is scaring the establishment.

In the Newsnsight show last night part of an interview with John Lydon was shown. Lydon aka Johnny Rotten fronted The Sex Pistols who wrote Anarchy In The UK and God Save The Queen. Lydon doesn't reckon much to Brand. Neither did Polly Toynbee. Why did the BBC show this interview? Because if the writer of those songs, as anti-establishment as they are, thinks that Brand is a prat then you, as a member of the working class, shouldn't listen to jetsetter Brand with millions in the bank.

In fact Brand is getting a right slagging off in the media. Even The Daily Mirror, considered the people's paper, is attacking Brand, examining his failed relationships.

Owen Jones, who continues to write in The ZioNatoGuardian, appears to be supporting Brand, but that could be a kiss of death for Brand because about this time last year Jones supported Jeremy Scahill. Remember that? Scahill bullied Stop The War into kicking Mother Agnes Mariam off the guest speaker list, claiming that she was pro-Assad, when all she was doing was highlighting the international cutthroats with evidence that Ghouta was a false flag.

Anyway, 9/11 was brought up on Newsnight. Brand has apparently questioned 9/11 in his new book, but only questioned.

9/11 was as blatant a conspiracy that you will ever come across. In ten years time we will all look back at 9/11 and ask ourselves, how did we not see that? Like the assassination of JFK. It took someone like Jim Garrison 3 years to finally get around to reading The Warren Report, and a further 2 years or so before the first trial of anyone for the assassination of JFK. Since then there have been investigations and admissions and strange deaths.

I thought Brand could have been more confident in his argument about 9/11. He referred only to the Bush-bin Laden relationship, thus implying that President George W Bush planned it. Bush was just the front man. It was PNAC who had written Rebuilding America's Defenses, and their predecessors who wrote A Clean Break. Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies. 9/11 was a US-Israeli-Saudi operation. The aim was war and regime change in seven nations in five years. But by 2007 these goals stood no chance of being achieved so they unleashed international cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya and then Syria under The Arab Spring which was engineered by the US State Dept. North Africa and The Middle East is extremely rich in natural resources which they want to control. The war in Syria is about a pipeline from the Pars gas field: Qatar and Saudi Arabia want to transport that gas through their countries, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe to challenge Russia; Iran and Syria want to transport that gas from Iran through Iraq and Syria to Europe while protecting Russia. NATO supports the Saudi proposal because it wants to destroy Russia.


Two days after a man shot a Canadian soldier and then ran into the Parliament building in Ottawa, Canada, I think there is now sufficient doubt in the official story.

Michael Zehaf-Bibeau is alleged to have been planning to go to Syria, and was allegedly on a terror watch list, but he wasn't on that list, and he was actually planning on going to Libya...and not for terrorism but to get off drugs.

He had travelled to Ottawa to sort out his passport to do this, and had been staying in a hostel while he sorted this out. But he had been demanding help from the government to get off drugs, threatening to commit crime to get sent to prison to receive help for drug addiction.

So he must have been on some kind of 'watch' list. Not necessarily terror-related, but for someone to be threatening to commit crime to be sent to prison to receive treatment indicates that that someone has a serious drug problem, realises this and wants help. And only serious crime leads to a prison sentence.

But the alarming piece of evidence that indicates to me that Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was possibly the victim of a provocation is that during his stay in Ottawa he was frequently in the presence of two English speaking men, talking about Islam, looking to steal a car, but those two men have now disappeared.

I'm thinking:
1. on his arrival in Ottawa Michael Zehaf-Bibeau came to the attention of someone looking for a Manchurian Candidate;
2. his profile sounded ideal; Muslim, criminal and addicted to drugs;
3. two English speaking men befriend him, give him drugs and/or talk of extreme Jihad;
4. Michael Zehaf-Bibeau is talked into some sort of trap, he loses his head (from drugs) and did what he did.

It is very suspicious that a man who goes to sort out his passport ends up locking down the Parliament building having murdered a soldier, when two English-speaking men who befriended and discussed Islam with him have now disappeared.

Thursday, October 23, 2014


The mission creep towards war on Syria is going to be like watching a cartoon, but a bloody cartoon engineered by headchopping Saudi Arabia. Picture a cartoon character creeping up on his victim, creeping quietly one minute, tiptoeing quickly the next.

A month ago Callous Cameron, who allowed David Haines and Alan Henning to have their heads sawn off by Islamic State and then cite those brutal murders as a casus belli, proposed a motion for war in Iraq.

The only explicit mention of Syria was this:
Notes that this motion does not endorse UK air strikes in Syria as part of this campaign, and any proposal to do so would be subject to a separate vote in parliament

But now Reaper drones will soon be flying over Syria.
Britain is to send military drones over Syria to gather intelligence in a move that will deepen its involvement in the campaign against Islamic State (Isis), Michael Fallon, the defence secretary, has revealed.

Downing Street insisted that the flights did not amount to military intervention and said there was a clear legal case for drone surveillance in Syria under the principles of “national and collective defence”.

The Reaper drones have already been active in Iraq, after parliament gave its approval for Britain to take part in air strikes against Isis. However, this will be the first time they will have ventured into Syrian territory, where David Cameron has not sought approval for military action because of fears it would be blocked by Labour and some within the prime minister’s own party.

[source : UK to fly military drones over Syria, The Guardian,, 21st October 2014]

Has this been OK'd with Syria?

What if Syria shoots one down?

What if a drone, oops, shoots at Syrian military?

NB this step was announced just days after the first Islamic State plot on British soil was allegedly busted, but no trial has yet taken place and thus no convictions have been made. There was something very, very fishy about those arrests: they occured just after Moazzam Begg claimed that the FCO rejected his proposals to negotiate the release of Alan Henning; the arrests diverted public outrage onto the alleged plot rather than the FCO; most of those initially arrested were released without charge; the highly irregular decision was made to mix all the charges together in one big charge sheet rather than lay out clearly each individual's charges.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014


This is aimed primarily at those who choose to put their hands over their ears and make really daft sounds (or indulge in other much more different pleasurable 'activities', like attending Killing Kittens).

Following the recent admission that MI5 blackmailed an IRA member from his relationship with a young girl, why do you think there is so much media silence about boys homes and particular guest houses in London, while Snowden's revelations are plastered all over the front pages?


I guess...





Why would high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day predict in 1969 that we would be bombarded by sex, and that homosexuality would be encouraged. "Anything goes", he said, meaning that the most obnoxious and repulsive sexual practice would be encouraged and accepted as the norm.

OK. Let's see where we are now.

First, let's get one thing straight (or in this context should that be erect). Sex is good. Real good. But why is that? It is to encourage procreation, i.e. to have children. If having sex was shit then we as a species would have been extinct centuries ago. This has been recognised for centuries, but I think has been ignored over the last couple of decades. And this is because of Dr Day's aforementioned speech.

In the last few decades homosexuality has been increasingly pushed in the media, and accepted by the general population. Personally, I think there is something unnatural about a bloke wanting to stick their cock up another bloke's arse. And I don't think I am alone in saying that. So why would homosexuality be encouraged? There are three reasons:
1. you may also have noticed this but in the last couple of decades, as this sexual liberation has occured, there has been a massive campaign that the earth is over-populated. Does homosexual sex produce children? Not naturally. So onto point 2;
2. If homosexual sex does not produce children then how can children be produced? Well, just ask Elton John; in a laboratory. And once the state controls the means of human production then it can produce what kind of humans are produced in the lab, but only if they know DNA works, hence the research into DNA;
3. I hate to ask you this, and please don't write in with your answers because I can guess 99% of them, but does having an orgasm make you feel like instigating a revolution against the obvious creeping fascism, violence and, well, how can I put it, Nazism? I doubt it. Forget 9/11. Just lie back with a smile on your face.

So, as the fascism creeps and tiptoes and creeps some more into society, and people become demoralised and spiritually destroyed by the poverty from wars and bailing out the banks, the people are being encouraged not into politics but into sex and all its immediate but empty physical relief, to make them feel good.

But sex means children. So homosexuality and abortion are encouraged, for its inability to reproduce children but also for its degeneracy. King Edward VII engineered WW1. But he was a nymphomaniac bisexual degenerate.

And for those who are rewarded with the great gift of children, keeping them form the evil clutches of the state (and the inherent abusive system that is being exposed) means long, long hours of work and toil, and thus no energy or interest in finding out how the world works. And when told how the world works then they ostracise those who tell them in favour of emotionless sex as a relief.

And children who cannot be looked after by their immediate family are grabbed by the state and passed through an abusive system as shown by recent cases in Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford.

So that is how sex, as good as it can be, is actually a weapon against the human race.


TOWIE 'star' Lauren Goodger does Essex, and all the men and women who fought and died in the British Monarchy engineered WW1 and WW2, proud.

Way to go, Essex!!


Tell us Lauren, how did The Balkan Committee contribute to World War One?


Following the recent debacle of the BND not actually blaming separatists but reported as saying so, and the known penetration of German media by the CIA, the farce around MH17 needs clearing up.

NATO seems very reluctant to provide any convincing evidence that Russia and/or pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17, instead relying very heavily on 'social media'. Let's repeat that but in a different way. NATO, with all its super duper rinky dinky spy machinery, cannot provide any convincing evidence that Russia and/or pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17, instead relying on an amateur weapons 'expert' based in Leicester. Germany is a member of NATO. Its intelligence chief is alleged to have claimed that pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17 with a BUK that the pro-Russia separatists acquired from a Ukraine military base. But that claim is now being denied.

So what are the BND actually claiming? And with what evidence?

Have they heard of Brown Moses? Assessed his work and conclusions? Given him credit?

And still Brown Moses in Leicester is convinced that pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17 with a BUK that Russia gave them and then took back after MH17 was shot down.

Brown Moses claims to have the timeline that this BUK took mapped, i.e. locations, times and dates all on video/photograph, with all identifying numbers matching, and in one particular video the covers have been partly-removed to expose that at least one of the four missiles is missing, thus implying that that was the BUK used to shoot down MH17.

However, there is one serious problem with this particular video: it was provided by the neo Nazis who kicked out the legitimate government of Ukraine in a violent NATO-sponsored coup. So we have to ask, as that video is the only one that I have seen that suggests that it was the BUK that may have shot down MH17:
1. do all identifying numbers match with all the other images used in the timeline?
2. has the location, time and date been verified?
3. is that the only video/image showing the cover partly-removed? If so, then why is that?

What we are dealing with in Ukraine is the creeping up onto the borders of Russia by NATO. From Checkpoint Charlie to Kiev. Billions of dollars was spent by the USA alone on anti-Russia organisations in Ukraine over 20 or so years. Earlier this year bona fide violent neo Nazis kicked out the legitimate government of Ukraine and declared themselves the new government. They proudly and unashamedly paraded their Nazi symbols, emblems and regalia in front of the world's media, but only the Russian media pointed it out. Their leader runs a foundation financed by NATO and has intimate links to Wall Street. Previous coups in Ukraine were financed by George Soros and Boris Berezovsky.

Ukraine is a prize possession for NATO, bordering Russia and a key transit for Russian energy to Europe. Billions of dollars have been spent over 20 years.

I have stated that I believe that the rebels had a BUK. A former commander Khodakovsky claims they had one, and there are photos and video of a BUK in rebel held territory.

But as stated above, they all seem to show four missiles, and all covered, while the one video that conveniently shows the missiles uncovered and at least one missile missing was provided by the neo Nazis in Kiev.

So those three questions above need answering:
1. do all identifying numbers match with all the other images used in the timeline?
2. has the location, time and date been verified?
3. is that the only video/image showing the cover partly-removed and missiles missing? If so, then why is that?


It was recently reported by Der Spiegel that the BND had told a oommittee of Germen policitians that after exhaustive investigation they believed that pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine shot down MH17 with a BUK that was captured from the Ukraine military.

But this is apparently now being denied. Brown Moses is now smug.

But what is being questioned?

A German journalist had recently exposed how German media has been penetrated by American intelligence to write propaganda.

This BND/MH17 story now appears part of that operation.

If the BND had the evidence to back up their alleged claim then it would be all over the NATO media. And it would be incredible if they had not heard of Brown Moses and his alleged stellar work, and then assessed it.

So does this actually mean that the BND has little confidence in the work and conclusions of Brown Moses?


Press TV reporter Serena Shim was murdered by NATO for exposing how NATO member Turkey has been allowing cutthroat Jihadis through the border from Turkey into Syria on NGO trucks.

Serena knew her life was in danger. She was killed in a head on collision with a heavy vehicle. Turkey is protecting the driver of the heavy vehicle.


[To the tune of Yellow Submarine by The Beatles: You're being fooled by a Russian submarine]

Are you wondering why (a) Russia would send a submarine into those tricky channels around Stockholm, (b) send a distress signal in Russian, and (c) the Swedish military somehow cannot find it?

Then panic no more.

The whole dramatic, nail-biting episode is a hoax.

It is all about dragging Sweden in to NATO.

Sweden is currently neutral, but both Sweden and Finland are being encouraged/enticed into NATO.

Sweden hasn't accused the submarine of being Russian. So if so, then where have the rumours come from that the sub (if that is what it is) is Russian?

Russia claims the submarine is Dutch.

But here is the editorial in the NATO flagship media outlet The Guardian:
Embarrassment lies in store whether this intelligence operation finds anything or not. The only question is who will be most embarrassed. The Russians cannot have meant this particular incursion as a signal, since it was meant to stay secret. If the Swedes succeed in finding and rescuing the submarine, the Russians will look like blundering bullies. If, on the other hand, the Swedes fail, it will be more difficult even for them to believe that their armed forces play any great part in ensuring the security of their country. In the long run, the logic of Sweden’s geostrategic position makes Nato membership almost inevitable. This incursion, coming so soon after the invasion of the Crimea and Ukraine, should help to make the point clear.

[source : The Guardian view on Sweden’s defences: is Nato inevitable?, The Guardian,, 20th October 2014]

So, Sweden's membership of NATO is inevitable, eh?

It is NATO on the march, not Russia.

From Checkpoint Charlie to Kiev. It is logical that the ever-expandng NATO empire would try to expand into Scandinavia. NATO recently grabbed Kiev through financing anti-Russian organisations in Ukraine with over $5 billion over 20 years, and then backing bona fide violent neo Nazi thugs when the then legitimate government in Kiev decided to reject a deal with the EU and IMF in favour of a deal with Russia, who kicked out that government in a violent NATO sponsored coup.

No. This is a hoax.

How incompetent and ridiculous are the Swedish Navy if they can't find a submarine in a narrow channel so close to their capital city?!

This is all about NATO expansion into Scandinavia. The Guardian's response has exposed the hoax.

So make yourself a brew, sit back, relax and digest your daily NATO propaganda.

Monday, October 20, 2014


Friday 14th November 2014 is Children in Need Day.

We dress up, throw change into a bucket, and we feel good inside for having done some good.

But CiN (pronounced Sin) has been going on for, how long? Well, can you believe it : since 1980!!

Since then CiN claims to have raised over £ 600 million.

But still, here we are again, throwing a tenner into a bucket.

But in the space of just a few years we bailed out the fascist banks with over £ 1 trillion!!

And as a consequence more children are in need due to below-inflation pay rises (if they are lucky to have a job), zero hours contracts, part time employment and unemployment, and social service cuts.

And in addition how much have we spent on wars? On missiles? On bullets? On shells? On transporting those missiles and bullets and shells and the military hardware to fire them overseas? And on the maintenance of that hardware and the bases overseas where they and the military personnel are based?

Since 9/11 we have been involved in wars in Iraq and Libya, and covertly in Syria. These wars are all part of a plan for a series of wars that 9/11 was designed to kick off.

And the war in Afghanistan was about restoring opium harvests, not to hunt down bin Laden.

When will the penny drop?

We have to carry on giving, but how long will it be before we ask: how can we spend trillions on war and bailing out banks but even more children in need have to live on handouts and donations from a bucket?


It has been announced today that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting baby number two in April next year. The precise due date is not given.

If we assume the precise due date is 1st April 2015 then in early September, when the pregnancy was announced, the baby was around 10 weeks old.

If we assume the precise due date is 30th April 2015 then in early September, when the pregnancy was announced, the baby was around 6 weeks old.

So it is reasonable to assume that in early September, when the pregnancy was announced, the baby was probably around 8 weeks old.

Now THAT is a very early announcement, which usually occur after 13 weeks,

Was the announcement made early to influence the outcome of the referendum on Scottish independence?


In 1969 high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day gave a speech in which he predicted a lot of what is happening today. One prediction was that we would be bombarded with sex, homsexuality would be encouraged, and that "anything goes".

I experienced this on 28th June this year when I stood alone (and humiliated) outside Freemasons Hall to protest the Freemasonic engineering of World War One, while just the other side of Covent Garden on The Strand and in Trafalgar Square tens of thousands had gathered to celebrate blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

Last night that agent of The Illuminati Lady Gaga wore a revealing dress while she sang a duet with Tony Bennett entitled "Anything Goes".

This is the kind of sick joke The Illuminati likes to pass by you, having somebody like her on a Sunday evening on a national favourite family TV show like Strictly Come Dancing singing such a song with such a title.

What next on a Sunday evening on the BBC? Miley Cyrus on a giant inflatable penis reciting Alisteir Crowley?


Can erotic animals sense evil?

And if they can, could they give a fuck?

My experience is that the answer to both these questions is; NO!! Are you havin' a laff?


So, a new puke-provoking series of The Only Way Is Essex started last night. I didn't watch it. But here is The Daily Mirror, allegedly the people's paper, on TOWIE:
After the dramatics in Ibiza the TOWIE gang come together this week for a party thrown by Bobby.

He's hosting a gay night in Soho with his boyfriend Vas, and are referring to themselves as the new Kimye - has Essex found its new King and King?

Ferne helps Charlie prep for their gay night to help boost his confidence by giving him a spray tan but overdoes it.

Jess and Chloe have an awkward encounter after their public twitter spat but can’t seem to come to an agreement.

James and Danielle follow through with their relationship counselling which brings out a whole new confidence in James.

Jasmin is the centre at a new host of rumours with Tommy and Georgia. Who is telling the truth?




One hundred years ago the British Monarchy engineered World War One. After over four years of slaughter in the trenches, and drownings in the oceans, the first attempt at world government was made in the form of The League of Nations. But that failed because the USA voted to stay out of it. So the British Monarchy engineered World War Two via Anglophile Wall Street creating both Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. And after nearly six years of war, much bloodier and more destructive than the first world war, involving more slaughter in the trenches, more drownings in the oceans and this time with deaths in the skies and atomic weapons killing hundreds of thousands in an instant, an initially sceptical USA agreed to a world government: the USA now hosts The United Nations in New York. Since then the UN, and a host of other world government institutions, have been usurping the powers of national sovereignty. For example, the EU now makes most of the laws in the UK.

Would our fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers, who fought and possibly died in both world wars, be proud of us if we followed the advice of The Daily Mirror:
So get yourself a brew, a biscuit and a pair of cosy socks and snuggle up on the sofa as we bring you all the latest goss as the show airs.

I seriously doubt it.

My advice is:
The Only Way Is The Truth Serum.

Sunday, October 19, 2014


Der Spiegel is reporting that the German BND has told a committee of senior German politicians that it believes that MH17 was shot down by Ukrainian separatists.

After completing a detailed analysis, Germany's foreign intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), has concluded that pro-Russian rebels were responsible for the crash of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 on July 19 in eastern Ukraine while on route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

In an Oct. 8 presentation given to members of the parliamentary control committee, the Bundestag body responsible for monitoring the work of German intelligence, BND President Gerhard Schindler provided ample evidence to back up his case, including satellite images and diverse photo evidence. The BND has intelligence indicating that pro-Russian separatists captured a BUK air defense missile system at a Ukrainian military base and fired a missile on July 17 that exploded in direct proximity to the Malaysian aircraft, which had been carrying 298 people.

[source : Deadly Ukraine Crash: German Intelligence Claims Pro-Russian Separatists Downed MH17, Der Spiegel,, 19th October 2014]

But here is what the German BND said about the alleged chemical attack in Ghouta in August last year.

In the briefing, Schindler said that only the Assad regime is in possession of binary chemical weapons such as sarin. The BND believes that regime experts would be the only ones capable of manufacturing such weapons and deploying them with small missiles. The BND believes that such weapons had been used several times prior to the attack on Aug. 21, which is believed to have killed more than 1,400 people. Schindler said in the earlier attacks, however, the poison gas mixture was diluted, explaining the much lower death tolls in those assaults.

During his 30-minute presentation, Schindler offered up scenarios to explain why the Assad regime resorted to chemical weapons use, including, he said, the possibility that Assad sees himself involved in a crucial battle for Damascus. The city is besieged by rebel groups, with particular pressure coming from the east. Schindler believes it is possible that the regime ordered the use of poison gas as a way of intimidating the rebels. It could also be the case that errors were made in mixing the gas and it was much more potent than anticipated, he said.

The analysis presented by the BND is similar to that produced by the US.

[source : Gas Attack: Germany Offers Clue in Search for Truth in Syria, Der Spiegel,, 3rd Septemnber 2013]

As yet none of the photos or images used by the BND have been released for us to verify.

But you can bet that Brown Moses wants to see them...because according to him the separatists were given the BUK by Russia, and did not capture it from a Ukraine military base as the BND believes.

The Kiev Nazis want us to believe that the separatists shot MH17 down. They said they didn't have any BUKs in the area, but Russia has produced images showing that there were. And Kiev has failed to release to the public the transcripts between ATCs and MH17.

It has been well over a year since Ghouta, Prince Bandar said he was going to unleash hell in Syria. The Syrian rebels had chemical weapons and had posted their experiments testing them along with threats of using those weapons on Youtube BEFORE Ghouta. And the incident was the perfect casus belli for NATO so it is an insult to logic that the SAA killed hundreds of their own people, children included. And if the SAA had done it then surely officers and civilians through their own investigations would have now found out and kicked Assad out. Instead Assad is still in power and is as popular as ever within Syria!! So how the fuck the BND can conclude that Assad did it, I don't know.

And if they got Ghouta so wrong, can they be trusted on MH17? Er, NO!!


It's too late. I couldn't trust you anyway now, even if you could help me.

You've blown your chance of being part of something wonderful about to happen to the human race.


On Sunday 24th August this year I sent a letter to the Foreign Secretary Phil Hammond (from Essex).

It seems he too does not want to reply to me.

Two months now...without reply.

But before he replies perhaps he could also answer this question:
Who decided to reject the proposal, initiated by Alan Henning's very own friends and family, that Moazzam Begg negotiate the release of Alan Henning, why and when?

Saturday, October 18, 2014


This is what I don't understand.

You have kids.

You know who I am.

You have seen what I do and can do.

You know what they do and can do.

I've said I think you can help me a lot in my battle against them.

Why are you not begging to help?

This is what I don't understand.


Watch the former hostage of Islamic State, Nicholas Henin, talk about David Haines and Alan Henning.

France denies paying a ransom for Henin, but read this:
Focus, citing Nato sources in Brussels, claimed that Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian personally took the money to Ankara during the week before the hostages were freed and that it was passed on to the kidnappers by the Turkish secret services.

[source : France denies paying ransom to Syrian Islamists for freed journalists, RFI,, 27th April 2014]

Now why would Islamic State release four French hostages?



Why would Islamic State release four French hostages but behead Foley, Sotloff, Haines and Henning? When IS has released hostages from other nations who paid ransoms?


If you didn't order the FCO to reject Moazzam Begg's proposal to negotiate Henning's release (an action that was actually initiated by Henning's family and friends), and then later detain Begg in custody awaiting trial on trumped up charges (thus denying Begg the freedom to return to Syria to negotiate the freedom of Henning and Haines), then find out who did!!

Because without these two actions you would not have had the chance to use the beheading of David Haines as a casus belli.

Friday, October 17, 2014


Further to the initial BBC report that Tarik Hassane had been charged, the following report clarifies that of the four who were initially arrested last week three have been released without charge.

Two other men, aged 20 and 21, arrested on 7 October on suspicion of being concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism were released without charge on Monday.

Another man, arrested on the same date, was released from custody yesterday after the Crown Prosecution Service advised the was “insufficient evidence” to bring charges “at this time”, the Yard said.

[source :
Terror plot suspects planned to murder police officers or soldiers in drive-by shooting, court hears, The Independent,, 17th October 2014]
And to further obfuscate what exactly Hassane is being charged with:
Mark Dawson, prosecuting, said the 21 details within the terror charge relate to the gang of four, but different items related to different gang members.

He did not give specifics about which details related to which gang members.

[source : Four men from London appear in court charged with terrorism offences including swearing oaths to join ISIS and obtaining a handgun and ammunition,, 17th October 2014]

From the same report, the charge sheet is:
Between 8 July 2014 and 7 October 2014 with the intention of committing acts of terrorism, or assisting others to commit such acts, you engaged in conduct in preparation for giving effect to that intention, namely:

Took an oath of allegiance to the group IS (Islamic State) a proscribed organization

Gave instructions on the use of secure communications

Set up methods of secret communications

Entered into covert discussions

Demonstrated trade craft by the use of code words for money, mopeds and firearms

Discussed and agreed the sourcing of a firearm

Discussed the sourcing of, and suitable make of moped

Discussed the storage of a moped in Shepherds Bush, West London

Downloaded and circulated the fatwa of Al Adnani

Considered, discussed and decided to act on the fatwa of Al Adnani

Retained an extract from the fatwa of Al Adani

Conducted research into makes of handguns

Arranged for the procurement of a Baikal handgun and ammunition

Entered into an agreement to procure a Baikal handgun and ammunition

Entered into an agreement to supply a Baikal handgun and ammunition

Delivered a converted Baikal handgun and 6 rounds of ammunition

Assisted in the collection and delivery of a converted Baikal handgun and 6 rounds of ammunition

Took possession of a converted Baikal handgun (incorporating a silencer) and 6 rounds of ammunition

Researched on YouTube for Baikal handguns having taken possession of one

Stored the Baikal handgun and ammunition

Viewed and retained an image sent via Instagram of two Metropolitan Police Officers

Viewed and retained an image sent via Instagram of two Metropolitan Police Community Support Officers

Conducted hostile reconnaissance utilising Google Street View mapping of Shepherds Bush Police Station and White City Territorial Army Barracks

Possessed a copy of Inspire edition 1 (Summer 2010)

Possessed a copy of Inspire winter 1431

Possessed extremist jihadi material including a copy of Dabiq edition 04 published on 4 October 2014 containing among other articles graphic images of the beheading of Steven Sotloff

What we have to consider is that:
1. Islamic State was created out of Jihadi organisations who were initially financially sponsored by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and supported logistically, morally and politically by this Disunited Fascist Queendom, the USA, Israel and France.
2. this was because the initial plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years, that was initially revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, was moribund;
3. Syria was one of those seven nations but by August 2013 President Assad was still in power, 2 1/2 years after the Arab Spring, that was CIA/NED/US State Dept engineered, had failed to oust Assad;
4. and the very strange event of 21st August 2013 had failed to provoke a large scale military intervention by NATO on the Jihadi side;
5. the British, according to Roland Dumas, began planning inserting Jihadis into in Syria in 2009;
6. demented preachers like Michael Adeblajo, who MI5 was trying to recruit, were and still are allowed to preach Jihad against Assad because there has been a Covenant of Security between MI5 and the Islamic terrorists for decades and Adeblajo was encouraging Muslims to join the Jihad against Assad.

Oh, it's a mess.

One big, bloody, cutthroat Jihadi mess.

And MI5, MI6 and The Metropolitan Police are up to their necks in it all.

And the war in Syria is all about kicking out Assad because he wants to build a pipeline to transport gas from the Pars field from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to Europe while protecting Russia's customer base, while Saudi Arabia and Qatar want to transport gas from the Pars field from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and on to Europe. However NATO are supporting the Qatar proposal because the Qataris and Turks (as NATO members) want to eradicate all Russian influence in Europe by weening Europe off Russian gas.

So what, you might ask?

Well, Russia and several other nations have just created the BRICS Development Bank as a rival to the IMF system, which is dominated by the Federal Reserve which is controlled by Anglophile Jewish banks under the control of the British Monarchy, who in turn engineered World War 1 through Freemasonry, and because no british-controlled world government followed WW1 the Federal Reserve created Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Putin is a threat. A massive threat. That is why the Washington Post attacked Putin this week because of a threat to shut down Memorial. So who are Memorial? They have received significant finance from NED for research into how to influence elections in Russia!!

Now is that blatant meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation, or is that blatant meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation?

But that makes no difference. The USA, on behalf of the DFQ, has been interfering in tens of nations, using terrorism and guerrilla warfare to oust democratically elected leaders. The latest of these is in Ukraine!!!!!!

It's weird how such small things fit into global geopolitics.

But Hassane was arrested on the same day that Moazzamm Begg claimed that he approached the FCO for help in negotiating the release of Alan Henning, and was rejected. Begg was subsequently detained in custody on trumped up charges, thus stopping him from negotiating the release of not just Henning but also David Haines. Both Haines and Henning had their heads sawn off, and Callous Cameron used Haines as a casus belli for war in Irsq, when we know the true purpose of the war is to oust Assad for that Qatari-Saudi pipeline.

Hassane was arrested with three others and he was said to be plotting beheadings. But the other three have been released without charge, and we have still not been told precisely what Hassane is charged with, only that he is NOT plotting beheadings, because his charge sheet and the charge sheets of a few other suspects have been curiously all lumped together.


Tarik Hassane has been charged with:
1. swearing an oath of allegiance to Islamic State;
2. communicating with secret methods;
3. conspiring to buy a moped;
4. reconnaissance of Shepherd's Bush police station and White City Territorial Army barracks;
5. filming police and police support officers;
6. having images of the beheading of Steven Sotloff.

Another man has been charged with firearm offences.

These are a far cry from the original charges. When Hassane was initially arrested the media had been planted with the seed story that Hassane was named "The Surgeon" and he was part of an IS plot to behead unspecified victims.

So regarding the charges above,
1. I cannot comment on 1.;
2. for 2. was he he just using standard encryption?
3. as far as I am aware buying a moped is not illegal;
4. how have the police found this? from watching public surveillance video?
5. at first this does look concerning;
6. many people, including journalists who hate IS, around the world will have images of the Sotloff beheading.

On Hassane's initial arrest, which was so spectacularly carried out the day that Moazzam Begg claimed that he had offered to negotiate the release of Alan Henning but the FCO refused, the Metropolitan Police Cmmissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe told BBC London:
"It is one of a series of arrests that we have had over the last few weeks which, taken together, for me confirm that the drumbeat around terrorism has changed," he said.

"It's a more intense drumbeat - we are having to be more interventionist and a lot of it is linked back to Syria and Iraq.

"These are arrests that in some way or other have got that sort of link."

In the same BBC report:
Whitehall officials have said the police operation "may have foiled the early stages" of a planned UK attack.

I still maintain that the initial arrests were made to divert public attention from the explosive allegations of Moazzam Begg. The whole nation had mourned the brutal murder of Alan Henning just days before Begg made his allegations that the FCO had rejected his proposals to negotiate the release of Alan Henning. The whole nation would be interested to know why those proposals were refused, but also why Begg was detained in custody on trumped up charges when he could have been negotiating the release of British hostages. But if Begg had been able to negotiate their release then Callous Cameron would not have been able to cite David Haines as a casus belli and we may not be at war, a war which is designed to oust Assad.

The chargas against Hassane as they stand are not exactly solid and there is a whiff of desperation to cobble a few charges together and make it look like terrorism.

But even if Hassane and the others are guilty, who can we thank? His own police force and MI5!!

Is is they who have allowed a Covenant of Security for decades between Islamic terrorists and themselves. And this been in operation for the last few years to provide a source of Jihadis to fight against President Assad of Syria, who decided to ally with Russia, Iraq and Iran to transport natural gas from the Pars field, in opposition to the Saudis and Qataris who want to transport gas from Pars through their nations through Jordan on to Turkey to ween Europe off Russian gas.

The timing of the initial arrests was highly suspicious, and that most of those initially arrested were released without charge and that Hassane has been charged with some very peculiar charges and not to behead someone, as we were initially led to believe, implies to me that there is more to these arrests than we are being told.

And I think it was divert public attention from the explosive allegations of Moazaam Begg, allegations that have now disappeared from public memory.

Thursday, October 16, 2014


Dear Stop the War Coalition

Get your facts right about World War One and the people will follow: the British Monarchy through Freemasonry did it, you clowns!!

Yours Truly



No contest.

JFK by Oliver Stone.

By a long, long way.

Before I first watched it I had already been involved in left wing politics, protesting the war on Iraq in 1991.

I never felt comfortable with left wing politics, but always knew deep inside that something was mot right with this world and that 'someone' was controlling things for their benefit.

But then one of those very strange moments in my life occured in September 1992 when this sudden urge came over me to watch JFK. So I rented it form Blockbuster, and despite it being 3 hours long I watched it again immediately after its first viewing. i.e. 6 hours of JFK. I then watched it again the following morning before I had to return it the next day.

And after that?

I read the film sources, read around the subject and other related subjects (which probably brought me to the attention of the secret police), and eventually I read the next work that blew my mind; The Biggest Secret by David Icke.

Since then, I think Icke is correct regarding the physical nature of this universe (I was fascinated by wave-particle duality during my maths and physics A Levels).

But shape-shifting reptilians is waaaaaaay beyond what your average lager-glugging, football-loving, mysoginist, lustful man (and now woman thanks to 'equal rights') can take.

But the British Monarchy engineering WW1 through Freemasonry is not beyond their ken. 99% already think Freemasonry is weird and corrupt.

And it is this series of facts that I believe holds the key to awakening the muggins British taxpayer.

And is perhaps the reason why Stop the War published and continue to publish Neil Faulkner's bogus The Real History of World War One.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014


Should I declare war on The Stop the War Coalition until they stop publishing Neil Faulkner's bogus The Real History of the First World War until it is replaced with something much more accurate which reflects the blatant engineering of the bloody conflict, that they say they oppose, by the British Monarchy?


Ignore Stop The War's Song of the Week, which is by Culture Club. If Stop The War were sincere they:
1. would not have published that debacle by Neil Faulkner laughingly entitled The Real History of the First World War which regurgitates the theories by the British agent Karl Marx, the stooge of British Intelligence David Urquhart, completely ignoring the British Monarchy's blatant engineering of the conflict and their reasons for doing so;
2. would have joined me outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June, but didn't.

In fact, I am wondering whether I should declare war on Stop The War until they get their history right!!!


Nu Soul feat. Kelli Rich 'Hide-A-Way' (Helicopter Vocal Mix)

Jamie Dee ‎-- Burnin' Up (European Mix)


I never once called you any names.

I was just quietly getting on with this.

And when I tried to tell you I was and still am ostracised!!

I hope, no demand, that you treat all your students with a lot more respect.

No wonder the country is so fucked up...


Are you like King Edward VII?

Are you a nymphomaniac and/or bisexual degenerate who doesn't have the power to engineer world wars but doesn't give a fuck about who engineered World War One anyway?

I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June this year, the centennial of the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand by FREEMASONS who had received encouragement and the weapons for the assassination from FREEMASONS and who knew that Ferdinand had been condemned to death by FREEMASONS in a FREEMASON lodge two years earlier.

I proposed this protest in January.

On the day nobody turned up to protest with me.

But just the other side of Covent Garden on The Strand thousands had gathered to 'celebrate' blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

I think our ancestors would be proud of me for remembering what they went through in the trenches. Not sure about those on The Strand...

I am pointing out that we have become arrogant and decadent and degenerate. Yes, enjoy life...but we all also have a tremendous responsibility for the children. We should not be delivering them into wars for and financial slavery to a cabal of kiddie-fiddling genocidal megalomaniacs...but at the moment we are...because of our arrogance and decadence and degeneracy.

And I'm not singling out Russell Brand personally with this. But is it true that he has a tattoo of our queen on his inner thigh to make him feel British? After all the wars and slavery we have brought to the world? If so it is very disappointing to hear.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014


The human race has been shat on.

The Transatlantic Slave Trade took centuries to outlaw.

Two engineered world wars, but these have only provoked calls for more world government.

A bailout occured in 2008: £ 1 trillion in 2008.

But still the original families are in power.

Still we live by their laws, while they do not.

And still nobody gives a fuck. Well, that's not quite true: some people do give a fuck, but it is the wrong kind of fuck that will not provide the infinite prosperity that we deserve.

In the TST, gross mass inhumanity to man provoked some kind of mass rebellion.

Since then rebellion against Germany caused WW1 (but that was engineered by Freemasonry).

In WW2 the same powers engineered the Holocaust...but this sadly led to the creation of Israel.

And since then?

Well, we saw last summer that the ordinary person in the street still doesn't give a f... More people do care about Palestine, but after nearly 70 years of Israeli barbarity over half the MPs failed to vote on Palestinian independence.

It will only take something extreme to hit people personally before they do anything. If it occurs to anyone else then so be it. The human race is selfish. They even laugh!

But what if someone raids their bank accounts?? Then it had better be a very very good reason...nothing less than saving the nation...AT LEAST!!!

Hence the bail in simulation yesterday.

The Bail In is planned.

It is being engineered.

Your reaction to it is up to you...

Do you want Bilderberg raiding your bank account to save their fascist necks so they can reduce population down to a half billion?

If not, then ask what you can do stop them.

I am awaiting someone currently unspecial to respecial themselves.

Waitimg and waiting and waiting....


As stated by a witness today, there has already been a lot going on at the Portsmouth address, which is the address of a known Jihadi who is known to have travelled to Syria.

In other words, very easy meat, and ideal for Hollywood purposes because very few are aware of the British foreign policy of recruiting Jihadis to oust Assad.

So why make arrests today?

Is it because two of the five arrested last week were arrested without charge? Thus implying that the other three are innocent? So 'they' had to arrest someone, particularly well known to them but also much of a threat to them because they were satisfying the British foreign policy of recruiting Jihadis for the Jihad against Assad?


It's Tuesday

It's evening.

It's October.

But the bastards are planning to take your own private personal savings and current account.

So I ask again: what is more important? An orgasm or the truth?

I also understand that there are some thinking, well why not both?

My answer to that question is: we have been looking for that perfect orgasm for millenia, and look where that has got us?

Two world wars, a Holocaust, global terrorism and a world government in waiting ready and waiting to slash human population to a half billion!! nice humans say to everyone they meet: good luck!!

It could be so much more different if particular perverts smashed their vanity.