Wednesday, October 25, 2017

WHY IS ALEX JONES PROTECTING ONE OF THE BIGGEST BRITISH INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS OF ALL TIME?



Alex Jones is protecting one of the biggest British Intelligence operations of all time: the attempted break up of the United States of America through the US Civil War. I would write the date it ended but the war still continues through Alex and other Confederate organisations and laws.

The British used one of Alex's heroes Andrew Jackson. Jackson was one of the largest and most powerful slaveholders in the United States, at one time owning 300 slaves across several plantations. Indeed, Jackson loved slavery so much that he organised a raid on Negro Fort where runaway slaves found sanctuary with the Seminoles. Jackson wanted the runaway slaves returned to their 'owners'. The raid ended in disaster when the officer commanding the raid fired a cannonball into the fort's arsenal, which blew up killing approximately 300.

Jackson hated big banks. The British used this hatred to break up the Second bank of the United States (BUS2) which under the management of Nicholas Biddell was doing a good job in paying off the national debt while growing the United States and its economy into a threat to the British empire. Jackson was very closely associated with the treasonous network of Aaron Burr. After Burr had assassinated Alexander Hamilton, after Hamilton had exposed Burr's treason, Burr found sanctuary at Jackson's Hermitage where Burr plotted even more treason. This latest plot was exposed, and Burr was prosecuted. Jackson gave a speech in Burr's defence, and Burr got off. Burr then fled to Great Britain where he stayed with British Intelligence chief Jeremy Bentham.

Burr returned to the USA a few years later, and began to use Jackson's exploits during the Battle of New Orleans against the British to portray Jackson as a patriotic military hero. Jackson began to rant against the BUS2, and won the 1828 election. He immediately set about destroying the BUS2, which would eventually lead to the creation of the Confederate States of America. But he also began another process which would assist in that creation: the ethnic cleansing of native Americans from large areas of states which would soon join the Confederacy. The ancestral lands of these native Americans were sold to planters who built plantations to be worked by slaves.

Jackson eventually withdrew federal funds from the BUS2 and placed them in banks of his cronies, who used the funds to create large amounts of credit, which led to the 1837 panic. With no coherent banking system the South was doomed to rely on slavery.

It was around this time that the British began to drive a wedge between the North and the South using slavery as the issue. The British sent their top man, Giuseppe Mazzini, for this.

Several states seceded in early 1861. One of these states was Texas. Texas was formed as a republic by European settlers who wanted to keep slaves but the Mexican government, which governed Texas, wanted to ban it. Virtually all states who seceded cited slavery as the prime cause for their secession.

Now, the problem for Alex Jones is that his family on both sides were serious, serious Confederates who fought at the rank of colonel and general for the Confederate Army. They were also big in Texas politics too. Alex has guests on his show who spout the neo-Confederate lie that the war was not about slavery at all, that it was actually all over a tariff.

And there lies the rub.

The most destructive war on United States soil and the Jones family fell for the British Intelligence plot, probably assisted the Texas secession, and fought for slavery.

So if Alex is protecting this plot, what other plots is he protecting?

Why did he dump Ron Paul in favour of Zionist Trump?

Why did Infowars stop criticising Israel and instead cosied up to the Zionists?

Why did Infowars stop blaming the FBI/CIA/MI5/MI6/Mossad/NATO for Islamic terror and instead shrugged their shoulders and said, "S'just Islam, innit?"

And why have Infowars, like the dinosaur media, not exposed the real Roy Cohn?









No comments: